Method and system for evaluating cardiac ischemia with an abrupt stop exercise protocol

ABSTRACT

A method of assessing cardiac ischemia in a subject to provide a measure of cardiac or cardiovascular health in that subject is described herein. The method comprises the steps of: (a) collecting a first RR-interval data set from the subject during a stage of gradually increasing heart rate (e.g., a stage of gradually increasing exercise load); (b) collecting a second RR-interval data set from the subject during a stage of gradually decreasing heart rate (e.g., a stage of gradually decreasing exercise load, or a stage of rest following an abrupt stop of exercise in a patient with coronary artery disease); (c) comparing the first RR-interval data set to the second RR-interval data set to determine the difference between the data sets; and (d) generating from the comparison of step (c) a measure of cardiac ischemia during exercise in the subject. A greater difference between the first and second data sets indicates greater cardiac ischemia and lesser cardiac or cardiovascular health in the subject. The data sets are collected in such a manner that they reflect almost exclusively the conduction in the heart muscle and minimize the effect on the data sets of rapid transients due to autonomic nervous system and hormonal control.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

[0001] This application is a continuation-in-part of copendingapplication Ser. No. 09/891,910, filed Jun. 26, 2001, which in turn isis a continuation-in-part of copending application Ser. No. 09/603,286,filed Jun. 26, 2000, the disclosures of both of which are incorporatedby reference herein in its entirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

[0002] The present invention relates to non-invasive high-resolutiondiagnostics of cardiac ischemia based on processing of body-surfaceelectrocardiogram (ECG) data. The invention's quantitative method ofassessment of cardiac ischemia may simultaneously indicate both cardiachealth itself and cardiovascular system health in general.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

[0003] Heart attacks and other ischemic events of the heart are amongthe leading causes of death and disability in the United States. Ingeneral, the susceptibility of a particular patient to heart attack orthe like can be assessed by examining the heart for evidence of ischemia(insufficient blood flow to the heart tissue itself resulting in aninsufficient oxygen supply) during periods of elevated heart activity.Of course, it is highly desirable that the measuring technique besufficiently benign to be carried out without undue stress to the heart(the condition of which might not yet be known) and without unduediscomfort to the patient.

[0004] The cardiovascular system responds to changes in physiologicalstress by adjusting the heart rate, which adjustments can be evaluatedby measuring the surface ECG R-R intervals. The time intervals betweenconsecutive R waves indicate the intervals between the consecutiveheartbeats (RR intervals). This adjustment normally occurs along withcorresponding changes in the duration of the ECG QT intervals, whichcharacterize the duration of electrical excitation of cardiac muscle andrepresent the action potential duration averaged over a certain volumeof cardiac muscle (FIG. 1). Generally speaking, an average actionpotential duration measured as the QT interval at each ECG lead may beconsidered as an indicator of cardiac systolic activity varying in time.

[0005] Recent advances in computer technology have led to improvementsin automatic analyzing of heart rate and QT interval variability. It iswell known now that the QT interval's variability (dispersion)observations performed separately or in combination with heart rate (orRR-interval) variability analysis provides an effective tool for theassessment of individual susceptibility to cardiac arrhythmias (B.Surawicz, J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol, 1996, 7, 777-784). Applicationsof different types of QT and some other interval variability tosusceptibility to cardiac arrhythmias are described in Chamoun U.S. Pat.No. 5,020,540, 1991; Wang U.S. Pat. No. 4,870,974, 1989; Kroll et al.U.S. Pat. No. 5,117,834, 1992; Henkin et al. U.S. Pat. NO. 5,323,783,1994; Xue et al. U.S. Pat. No. 5,792,065, 1998; Lander U.S. Pat. No.5,827,195, 1998; Lander et al. U.S. Pat. No. 5,891,047, 1999; Hojum etal. U.S. Pat. No. 5,951,484, 1999).

[0006] It was recently found that cardiac electrical instability can bealso predicted by linking the QT-dispersion observations with the ECGT-wave alternation analysis (Verrier et al., U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,560,370;5,842,997; 5,921,940). This approach is somewhat useful in identifyingand managing individuals at risk for sudden cardiac death. The authorsreport that QT interval dispersion is linked with risk for arrhythmiasin patients with long QT syndrome. However, QT interval dispersionalone, without simultaneous measurement of T-wave alternation, is saidto be a less accurate predictor of cardiac electrical instability (U.S.Pat. No. 5,560,370 at column 6, lines 4-15).

[0007] Another application of the QT interval dispersion analysis forprediction of sudden cardiac death is developed by J. Sarma (U.S. Pat.No. 5,419,338). He describes a method of an autonomic nervous systemtesting that is designed to evaluate the imbalances between bothparasympathetic and sympathetic controls on the heart and, thus, toindicate a predisposition for sudden cardiac death.

[0008] The same author suggested that an autonomic nervous systemtesting procedure might be designed on the basis of the QT hysteresis(J. Sarma et al., PACE 10, 485-491 (1988)). Hysteresis between exerciseand recovery was observed, and was attributed to sympatho-adrenalactivity in the early post-exercise period. Such an activity wasrevealed in the course of QT interval adaptation to changes in the RRinterval during exercise with rapid variation of the load.

[0009] The influence of sympatho-adrenal activity and the sharpdependence of this hysteresis on the time course of abrupt QT intervaladaptation to rapid changes in the RR interval dynamics radicallyovershadows the method's susceptibility to the real ischemic-likechanges of cardiac muscle electrical parameters and cardiac electricalconduction. Therefore, this type of hysteresis phenomenon would not beuseful in assessing the health of the cardiac muscle itself, or inassessing cardiac ischemia.

[0010] A similar sympatho-adrenal imbalance type hysteresis phenomenonwas observed by A. Krahn et al. (Circulation 96, 1551-1556 (1997)(seeFIG. 2 therein)). The authors state that this type of QT intervalhysteresis may be a marker for long-QT syndrome. However, long-QTsyndrome hysteresis is a reflection of a genetic defect of intracardiacion channels associated with exercise or stress-induced syncope orsudden death. Therefore, similar to the example described above,although due to two different reasons, it also does not involve ameasure of cardiac ischemia or cardiac muscle ischemic health.

[0011] A conventional non-invasive method of assessing coronary arterydiseases associated with cardiac ischemia is based on the observation ofmorphological changes in a surface electrocardiogram duringphysiological exercise (stress test). A change of the ECG morphology,such as an inversion of the T-wave, is known to be a qualitativeindication of ischemia. The dynamics of the ECG ST-segments arecontinuously monitored while the shape and slope, as well as ST-segmentelevation or depression, measured relative to an average base line, arealtering in response to exercise load. A comparison of any of thesechanges with average values of monitored ST segment data provides anindication of insufficient coronary blood circulation and developingischemia. Despite a broad clinical acceptance and the availability ofcomputerized Holter monitor-like devices for automatic ST segment dataprocessing, the diagnostic value of this method is limited due to itslow sensitivity and low resolution. Since the approach is specificallyreliable primarily for ischemic events associated with relatively highcoronary artery occlusion, its widespread use often results in falsepositives, which in turn may lead to unnecessary and more expensive,invasive cardiac catheterization.

[0012] Relatively low sensitivity and low resolution, which arefundamental disadvantages of the conventional ST-segment depressionmethod, are inherent in such method's being based on measuring anamplitude of a body surface ECG signal, which signal by itself does notaccurately reflect changes in an individual cardiac cell's electricalparameters normally changing during an ischemic cardiac event. A bodysurface ECG signal is a composite determined by action potentialsaroused from discharge of hundred of thousands of individual excitablecardiac cells. When electrical activity of excitable cells slightly andlocally alters during the development of exercise-induced localischemia, its electrical image in the ECG signal on the body surface issignificantly overshadowed by the aggregate signal from the rest of theheart. Therefore, regardless of physiological conditions, such as stressor exercise, conventional body surface ECG data processing ischaracterized by a relatively high threshold (lower sensitivity) ofdetectable ischemic morphological changes in the ECG signal. An accurateand faultless discrimination of such changes is still a challengingsignal processing problem.

[0013] Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to provide anon-invasive technique for detecting and measuring cardiac ischemia in apatient.

[0014] Another object of the invention is to provide a technique fordetecting and measuring cardiac ischemia, which technique is not undulyuncomfortable or stressful for the patient.

[0015] Another object of the invention is to provide a technique fordetecting and measuring cardiac ischemia, which technique may beimplemented with relatively simple equipment.

[0016] Still another object of the invention is to provide a techniquefor detecting and measuring cardiac ischemia, which technique issensitive to low levels of such ischemia.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

[0017] The present invention overcomes the deficiencies in theconventional ST-segment analysis. Although still based on the processingof a body surface ECG signal, it nevertheless provides a highlysensitive and high resolution method for distinguishing changes incardiac electrical conduction associated with developing cardiacischemia. In addition to the significant cardiac ischemic changesdetectable by the conventional method, the present invention allows oneto determine much smaller ischemia-induced conditions and alterations incardiac electrical conduction. Thus, unlike a conventional ST-segmentdepression ischemic analysis, the method of the present invention opensup opportunities to detect low-level cardiac ischemia (undetectable viathe regular ST-segment method) and also to resolve and monitor smallvariations of cardiac ischemia. In particular, individuals who would beconsidered of the same level of cardiac and cardiovascular healthaccording to a conventional ECG evaluation (an ST-depression method),will have different measurements if compared according to the method ofthe present invention, and the cardiac and cardiovascular health of anindividual can be quantitatively evaluated, compared and monitored byrepeated applications of the method of the present invention.

[0018] The present invention is based in part on the discovery that,under certain physiological conditions, QT- and/or RR-interval data setsmay be interpreted as representing composite dispersion-restitutioncurves, which characterize the basic dynamic properties of the medium(in this case, cardiac muscle). Indeed, if rapid interval adaptationfacilitated by sympatho-adrenal activity occurs much faster than gradualheart rate changes following slow alteration of external physiologicalconditions, then the interval may be considered primarily as a functionof a heart rate and/or a preceding cardiac cycle length and does notsubstantially depend on time-dependent sympatho-adrenal transients. Insuch a case a particular interval data set determines atime-independent, dispersion-like, quasi-stationary curve which does notsubstantially depend on rapid adaptational transients and dependsprimarily on medium electrical parameters.

[0019] Based on this discovery, the present invention provides a highlysensitive and high resolution method of assessing cardiac ischemia. Thismethod allows one to detect comparatively small alterations of cardiacmuscle electrical excitation properties that develop during even amoderate ischemic condition. For example, consider a gradual heart rateadjustment in a particular human subject in response to slow(quasi-stationary), there-and-back changes of external physiologicalconditions. Ideally, when a cardiac muscle is supplied by a sufficientamount of oxygen during both gradually increasing and graduallydecreasing heart rate stages, the corresponding, there-and-back,quasi-stationary interval curves which result should be virtuallyidentical. However, if ischemia exists, even if only to a very minorextent, there will be alterations of cardiac muscle repolarization andexcitation properties for the human subject with the result that oneobserves a specific quasi-stationary hysteresis loop. Unlikenon-stationary loops (J. Sarma et al., supra (1987); A. Krahn et al.,supra (1997)), the quasi-stationary hystereses of the present inventiondo not vary substantially versus the course of sympatho-adrenal intervaladjustment. The domains and shapes of these loops are not significantlyaffected by time-dependent transients rapidly decaying during atransition from one particular heart rate to another; instead, theydepend primarily on ischemia-induced changes of medium parameters. Thedomain encompassed by such a quasi-stationary hysteresis loop and itsshape represent a new quantitative characteristics that indicate cardiacmuscle health itself and the health of the cardiovascular system ingeneral. Moreover, any measure of the shape and/or domain enclosed inthe hysteresis loop (a measure of a set as defined in the integraltheory) possesses the property that any expansion of the domain resultsin an increase of the measure. Any such mathematical measure can betaken as the new characteristics of cardiac health mentioned above. Anarbitrary monotonic function of such a measure would still represent thesame measure in another, transformed scale.

[0020] A first aspect of the present invention is a method of assessingcardiac ischemia in a subject to provide a measure of cardiovascularhealth in that subject. The method comprises the steps of:

[0021] (a) collecting a first RR-interval data set (e.g., a first QT-and RR-interval data set) from the subject during a stage of graduallyincreasing heart rate;

[0022] (b) collecting a second RR-interval data set (e.g., a second QT-and RR-interval data set) from the subject during a stage of graduallydecreasing heart rate;

[0023] (c) comparing said first interval data set to the second intervaldata set to determine the difference between the data sets; and

[0024] (d) generating from the comparison of step (c) a measure ofcardiac ischemia during exercise in said subject, wherein a greaterdifference between said first and second data sets indicates greatercardiac ischemia and lesser cardiovascular health in said subject.

[0025] During the periods of gradually increasing and graduallydecreasing heart rate the effect of the sympathetic, parasympathetic,and hormonal control on formation of the hysteresis loop is sufficientlysmall, minimized or controlled so that the ischemic changes are readilydetectable. This maintenance is achieved by effecting a gradual increaseand gradual decrease in the heart rate, such as, for example, bycontrolling the heart rate through pharmacological intervention, bydirect electrical stimulation of the heart, or by gradually increasingand gradually decreasing exercise loads.

[0026] Accordingly, the foregoing method can be implemented in a varietyof different ways. A particular embodiment comprises the steps of:

[0027] (a) collecting a first RR-interval data set (e.g., a first QT-and RR-interval data set) from said subject during a stage of graduallyincreasing exercise load and gradually increasing heart rate;

[0028] (b) collecting a second RR-interval data set (e.g., a second QT-and RR-interval data set) from said subject during a stage of graduallydecreasing exercise load and gradually decreasing heart rate;

[0029] (c) comparing the first RR-interval data set to the secondRR-interval data set to determine the difference between said data sets;and

[0030] (d) generating from said comparison of step (c) a measure ofcardiac ischemia during exercise in said subject, wherein a greaterdifference between said first and second data sets indicates greatercardiac ischemia and lesser cardiovascular health in said subject.

[0031] In another embodiment of the invention, a rest stage following anabrupt stop in exercise can serve as the period of gradually decreasingheart rate in a patient afflicted with coronary artery disease.

[0032] A second aspect of the present invention is a system forassessing cardiac ischemia in a subject to provide a measure ofcardiovascular health in that subject. The system comprises:

[0033] (a) an ECG recorder for collecting a first RR-interval data set(e.g., a first QT- and RR-interval data set) from the subject during astage of gradually increasing heart rate and collecting a secondRR-interval data set (e.g., a second QT- and RR-interval data) set fromthe subject during a stage of gradually decreasing heart rate;

[0034] (b) a computer program running in a computer or other suitablemeans for comparing said first interval data set to the second intervaldata set to determine the difference between the data sets; and

[0035] (c) a computer program running in a computer or other suitablemeans for generating from said determination of the difference betweenthe data sets a measure of cardiac ischemia during exercise in saidsubject, wherein a greater difference between the first and second datasets indicates greater cardiac ischemia and lesser cardiovascular healthin the subject.

[0036] A further aspect of the present invention is a method ofassessing cardiac ischemia in a subject to provide a measure of cardiacor cardiovascular health in that subject, the method comprising thesteps, performed on a computer system, of:

[0037] (a) providing a first RR-interval data set (e.g., a first QT- andRR-interval data set) collected from the subject during a stage ofgradually increasing heart rate;

[0038] (b) providing a second RR-interval data set (e.g., a second QT-and RR-interval data set) collected from the subject during a stage ofgradually decreasing heart rate;

[0039] (c) comparing the first interval data set to the second intervaldata set to determine the difference between the data sets; and

[0040] (d) generating from the comparison of step (c) a measure ofcardiac ischemia during stimulation in the subject, wherein a greaterdifference between the first and second data sets indicates greatercardiac ischemia and lesser cardiac or cardiovascular health in thesubject.

[0041] The first and second interval data sets may be collected whileminimizing the influence of rapid transients due to autonomic nervoussystem and hormonal control on the data sets. The first and secondinterval data sets are collected without an intervening rest stage. Thegenerating step may be carried out by generating curves from each of thedata sets, and/or the generating step may be carried out by comparingthe shapes of the curves from data sets. In a particular embodiment, thegenerating step is carried out by determining a measure of the domainbetween the curves. In another particular embodiment, the generatingstep is carried out by both comparing the shapes of the curves from datasets and determining a measure of the domain between the curves. Themethod may include the further step of displaying the curves. In oneembodiment the comparing step may be carried out by: (i) filtering thefirst and second interval data sets; (ii) generating a smoothedhysteresis loop from the filtered first and second interval data sets;and then (iii) determining a measure of the domain inside the smoothedhysteresis loop. In another embodiment, the comparing step may becarried out by: (i) filtering the first and second interval data sets;(ii) generating preliminary minimal values for the first and secondinterval data sets; (iii) correcting the preliminary minimal values;(iv) generating first and second preliminary smoothed curves from eachof the filtered data sets; (v) correcting the preliminary smoothedcurves; (vi) fitting the preliminary smoothed curves; (vii) generating asmoothed hysteresis loop from the first and second fitted smoothedcurves; and then (viii) determining a measure of the domain inside thehysteresis loop. In still another embodiment, the comparing step iscarried out by: (i) filtering the first and second interval data sets bymoving average smoothing; (ii) generating a smoothed hysteresis loopfrom the filtered first and second interval data sets; and then (iii)determining a measure of the domain inside the hysteresis loop.

[0042] A further aspect of the present invention is a computer systemfor assessing cardiac ischemia in a subject to provide a measure ofcardiac or cardiovascular health in that subject, the system comprising:

[0043] (a) means for providing a first RR-interval data set (e.g., afirst QT- and RR-interval data set) from the subject during a stage ofgradually increasing heart rate;

[0044] (b) means for providing a second RR-interval data set (e.g. asecond QT- and RR-interval data set) from the subject during a stage ofgradually decreasing heart rate;

[0045] (c) means for comparing the first interval data set to the secondinterval data set to determine the difference between the data sets; and

[0046] (d) means for generating from the comparison of step (c) ameasure of cardiac ischemia during stimulation in the subject, wherein agreater difference between the first and second data sets indicatesgreater cardiac ischemia and lesser cardiac or cardiovascular health inthe subject.

[0047] A still further aspect of the present invention is a computerprogram product for assessing cardiac ischemia in a subject to provide ameasure of cardiac or cardiovascular health in that subject, thecomputer program product comprising a computer usable storage mediumhaving computer readable program code means embodied in the medium, thecomputer readable program code means comprising:

[0048] (a) computer readable program code means for comparing a firstRR-interval data set (e.g., a first QT- and RR-interval data set) to asecond RR-interval data set (e.g., a second QT- and RR-interval dataset) to determine the difference between the data sets; and

[0049] (b) computer readable program code means for generating from thecomparison of step (c) a measure of cardiac ischemia during stimulationin the subject, wherein a greater difference between the first andsecond data sets indicates greater cardiac ischemia and lesser cardiacor cardiovascular health in the subject.

[0050] While the present invention is described herein primarily withreference to the use of QT- and RR-interval data sets, it will beappreciated that the invention may be implemented in simplified formwith the use of RR-interval data sets alone. For use in the claimsbelow, it will be understood that the term “RR-interval data set” isintended to be inclusive of both the embodiments of QT- and RR-intervaldata sets and RR-interval data sets alone, unless expressly subject tothe proviso that the data set does not include a QT-interval data set.

[0051] The present invention is explained in greater detail in thedrawings herein and the specification set forth below.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0052]FIG. 1 is a schematic graphic representation of the actionpotential in cardiac muscle summed up over its volume and the inducedelectrocardiogram (ECG) recorded on a human's body surface.

[0053]FIG. 2A depicts the equations used in a simplified mathematicalmodel of periodic excitation.

[0054]FIG. 2B depicts a periodic excitation wave (action potential, u,and instantaneous threshold, v, generated by computer using a simplifiedmathematical model, the equations of which are set forth in FIG. 2A.

[0055]FIG. 2C depicts a family of four composite dispersion-restitutioncurves corresponding to four values of the medium excitation threshold.

[0056]FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an apparatus for carrying out thepresent method.

[0057]FIG. 4A is a block diagram of the processing steps for dataacquisition and analysis of the present invention.

[0058]FIG. 4B is an alternative block diagram of the processing stepsfor data acquisition and analysis of the present invention.

[0059]FIG. 5 illustrates experimental QT-interval versus RR-intervalhysteresis loops for two healthy male (23year old, thick line and 47year old, thin line) subjects plotted on the compositedispersion-restitution curve plane.

[0060]FIG. 6 provides examples of the QT-RR interval hysteresis for twomale subjects, one with a conventional ECG ST-segment depression (thinline) and one with a history of a myocardial infarction 12 years priorto the test (thick line). The generation of the curves is explained ingreater detail in the specification below.

[0061]FIG. 7 illustrates sensitivity of the present invention and showstwo QT-RR interval hysteresis loops for a male subject, the first one(thick lines) corresponds to the initial test during which an ST-segmentdepression on a conventional ECG was observed, and the second one shownby thin lines measured after a period of regular exercise.

[0062]FIG. 8 illustrates a comparative cardiac ischemia analysis basedon a particular example of a normalized measure of the hysteresis looparea. <CII>=(CII−CII_(min))/(CII_(max)−CII_(min)) (“CII” means “cardiacischemia index”). O_(I), X_(I), and Y_(I) represent human subject data.X_(i) represents data collected from one subject (0.28-0.35) in a seriesof tests (day/night testing, run/walk, about two months between tests);exercise peak heart rate ranged from 120 to 135. Y_(i) represents datacollected from one subject (0.46-0.86) in a series of tests (run/walk,six weeks between tests before and after a period of regular exercisestage); exercise peak heart rate ranged from 122 to 146. Black barsindicate a zone (<CII> less than 0.70) in which a conventional STdepression method does not detect cardiac ischemia. The conventionalmethod may detect cardiac ischemia only in a significantly narrowerrange indicated by high white bars (Y₂, Y₃, O₇: <CII> greater than0.70).

[0063]FIG. 9 illustrates a typical rapid peripheral nervous system andhormonal control adjustment of the QT and RR interval to an abrupt stopin exercise (that is, an abrupt initiation of a rest stage).

[0064]FIG. 10 illustrates a typical slow (quasi-stationary) QT and RRinterval adjustment measured during gradually increasing and graduallydecreasing cardiac stimulation.

[0065]FIG. 11 demonstrates a block-diagram of the data processing by themethod of optimized consolidation of a moving average, exponential andpolynomial fitting (Example 10, steps 1-8).

[0066]FIG. 12 demonstrates results of the processing throughout steps 1to 8 of Example 10. Upper panels show QT and RR data sets processed fromsteps 1 to 3 (from left to right respectively), and the QT/RR hysteresisloop after step 1. The exponential fitting curves (step 3) are shown ingray in the first two panels. Low panels show the same smoothdependencies after processing from step 4 to a final step 8. Here theCII (see right low panel) is equal to a ratio S/{((T_(RR)⁻(t_(end)−t_(min) ^(RR))−T_(RR) ⁻(0))((T_(QT) ⁺(t_(start)−t_(min)^(QT))−T_(QT) ⁺(0))} (see example 10, section 7).

[0067]FIG. 13 demonstrates a block-diagram of the data processing by themethod of a sequential moving average (Example 11, steps 1-3)

[0068]FIG. 14 demonstrates results of the processing throughout steps 1to 2 of Example 11. Upper panels show processed QT and RR data sets, andthe QT/RR hysteresis loop after step 1 (from left to rightrespectively). Low panels show the same smooth dependencies after thesecond moving average processing and a final step 3.

[0069]FIG. 15 shows a general data flow chart for major steps inoptimized nonlinear transformation method. The left-hand side and theright-hand side boxes describe similar processing stages for the RR andQT-intervals, respectively.

[0070]FIG. 16 shows a detailed data flow chart for one data subset,{t^(k),T^(k) _(RR)} or {t^(k),T^(k) _(QT)} during stages (1a/b) through(3a/b) in FIG. 15. The preliminary stage, boxes 1 through 7, uses acombination of traditional data processing methods and includes: movingaveraging (1), determination of a minimum region (2), fitting aquadratic parabola to the data in this region (3), checking consistencyof the result (4), finding the minimum and centering data at the minimum(5) and (6), conditionally sorting the data (7). Stages (8) through (11)are based on the dual-nonlinear transformation method for the non-linearregression.

[0071]FIG. 17 displays the nonlinear transformation of a filteredRR-interval data set. Panel A shows the data on the original(t,y)-plane, the minimum is marked with an asterisk inside a circle.Panels B and C show the transformed sets on the (t,u)-plane, for j=1 andfor j=2, respectively. The image of the minimum is also marked with anencircled asterisk. Note that the transformed data sets concentratearound a monotonously growing (average) curve with a clearly linearportion in the middle.

[0072]FIG. 18 is similar to FIG. 17 but for a QT-interval data set.

[0073]FIG. 19 displays an appropriately scaled representation for thefamily of functions ξ(α,β,τ) for fifteen values of parameter β varyingwith the step Δβ=0.1 from β=−0.9 (lower curve) through β=0 (medium, boldcurve), to β=0.5 (upper curve). The function ξ(α,β,τ) is continuous inall three variables and as a function of τ has a unit slope at τ=0,ξ′(α,β,0)=1.

[0074]FIG. 20 shows an example of full processing of the RR and QT datasets for one patient. Panels A and C represent RR and QT data sets andtheir fit. Panel B shows the corresponding ascending and descendingcurves and closing line on the (T_(RR),T_(QT))-plane, on which the areaof such a hysteresis loop has the dimension of time-squared. Panel Dshows a hysteresis loop on the (f_(RR),T_(QT))-plane, wheref_(RR)=1/T_(RR) is the heart rate, on which the loop area isdimensionless. The total error-for Panel A is 2.2% and for Panel C is0.8%

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

[0075] The present invention is explained in greater detail below. Thisdescription is not intended to be a detailed catalog of all thedifferent manners in which particular elements of the invention can beimplemented, and numerous variations will be apparent to those skilledin the art based upon the instant disclosure.

[0076] As will be appreciated by one of skill in the art, certainaspects of the present invention may be embodied as a method, dataprocessing system, or computer program product. Accordingly, certainaspects of the present invention may take the form of an entirelyhardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment, or an embodimentcombining software and hardware aspects. Furthermore, certain aspects ofthe present invention may take the form of a computer program product ona computer-usable storage medium having computer readable program codemeans embodied in the medium. Any suitable computer readable medium maybe utilized including, but not limited to, hard disks, CD-ROMs, opticalstorage devices, and magnetic storage devices.

[0077] Certain aspects of the present invention are described below withreference to flowchart illustrations of methods, apparatus (systems),and computer program products. It will be understood that each block ofthe flowchart illustrations, and combinations of blocks in the flowchartillustrations, can be implemented by computer program instructions.These computer program instructions may be provided to a processor of ageneral purpose computer, special purpose computer, or otherprogrammable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such thatthe instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer orother programmable data processing apparatus, create means forimplementing the functions specified in the flowchart block or blocks.

[0078] Computer program instructions may also be stored in acomputer-readable memory that can direct a computer or otherprogrammable data processing apparatus to function in a particularmanner, such that the instructions stored in the computer-readablememory produce an article of manufacture including instruction meanswhich implement the function specified in the flowchart block or blocks.

[0079] Computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computeror other programmable data processing apparatus to cause a series ofoperational steps to be performed on the computer or other programmableapparatus to produce a computer implemented process such that theinstructions which execute on the computer or other programmableapparatus provide steps for implementing the functions specified in theflowchart block or blocks.

[0080] 1. Definitions.

[0081] “Cardiac ischemia” refers to a lack of or insufficient bloodsupply to an area of cardiac muscle. Cardiac ischemia usually occurs inthe presence of arteriosclerotic occlusion of a single or a group ofcoronary arteries. Arteriosclerosis is a product of a lipid depositionprocess resulting in fibro-fatty accumulations, or plaques, which growon the internal walls of coronary arteries. Such an occlusioncompromises blood flow through the artery, which reduction then impairsoxygen supply to the surrounding tissues during increased physiologicalneed—for instance, during increased exercise loads. In the later stagesof cardiac ischemia (e.g. significant coronary artery occlusion), theblood supply may be insufficient even while the cardiac muscle is atrest. However, in its earlier stages such ischemia is reversible in amanner analogous to how the cardiac muscle is restored to normalfunction when the oxygen supply to it returns to a normal physiologicallevel. Thus, ischemia that may be detected by the present inventionincludes episodic, chronic and acute ischemia.

[0082] “Exercise” as used herein refers to voluntary skeletal muscleactivity of a subject that increases heart rate above that found at asustained stationary resting state. Examples of exercise include, butare not limited to, cycling, rowing, weight-lifting, walking, running,stair-stepping, etc., which may be implemented on a stationary devicesuch as a treadmill or in a non-stationary environment.

[0083] “Exercise load” or “load level” refers to the relativestrenuousness of a particular exercise, with greater loads or loadlevels for a given exercise producing a greater heart rate in a subject.For example, load may be increased in weight-lifting by increasing theamount of weight; load may be increased in walking or running byincreasing the speed and/or increasing the slope or incline of thewalking or running surface; etc.

[0084] “Gradually increasing” and “gradually decreasing” an exerciseload refers to exercise in which the subject is caused to perform anexercise under a plurality of different sequentially increasing orsequentially decreasing loads. The number of steps in the sequence canbe infinite so the terms gradually increasing and gradually decreasingloads include continuous load increase and decrease, respectively.

[0085] “Intervening rest”, when used to refer to a stage followingincreased cardiac stimulation, refers to a stage of time initiated by asufficiently abrupt decrease in heart stimulation (e.g., an abruptdecrease in exercise load) so that it evokes a clear sympatho-adrenalresponse. Thus, an intervening rest stage is characterized by a rapidsympatho-adrenal adjustment (as further described in Example 8 below),and the inclusion of an intervening rest stage precludes the use of aquasi-stationary exercise (or stimulation) protocol (as furtherdescribed in Example 9 below).

[0086] “Hysteresis” refers to a lagging of the physiological effect whenthe external conditions are changed.

[0087] “Hysteresis curves” refer to a pair of curves in which one curvereflects the response of a system to a first sequence of conditions,such as gradually increasing heart rate, and the other curve reflectsthe response of a system to a second sequence of conditions, such asgradually decreasing heart rate. Here both sets of conditions areessentially the same—ie., consist of the same (or approximately thesame) steps—but are passed in different order in the course of time. A“hysteresis loop” refers to a loop formed by the two contiguous curvesof the pair.

[0088] “Electrocardiogram” or “ECG” refers to a continuous or sequentialrecord (or a set of such records) of a local electrical potential fieldobtained from one or more locations outside the cardiac muscle. Thisfield is generated by the combined electrical activity (action potentialgeneration) of multiple cardiac cells. The recording electrodes may beeither subcutaneously implanted or may be temporarily attached to thesurface of the skin of the subject, usually in the thoracic region. AnECG record typically includes the single-lead ECG signal that representsa potential difference between any two of the recording sites includingthe site with a zero or ground potential.

[0089] “Quasi-stationary conditions” refer to a gradual change in theexternal conditions and/or the physiological response it causes thatoccurs much slower than any corresponding adjustment due tosympathetic/parasympathetic and hormonal control. If the representativetime of the external conditions variation is denoted by τ_(ext), andτ_(int) is a representative time of the fastest of the internal,sympathetic/parasympathetic and hormonal control, then “quasi-stationaryconditions” indicates τ_(ext)>>τ_(int) (e.g., τ_(ext) is at least aboutfive times greater than τ_(int)). “An abrupt change” refers to anopposite situation corresponding to a sufficiently fast change in theexternal conditions as compared with the ratesympathetic/parasympathetic and hormonal control-that is, it requiresthat τ_(ext)<<τ_(int) (e.g., τ_(ext) is at least about five times lessthan τ_(int)). In particular, “an abrupt stop” refers to a fast removalof the exercise load that occurs during time shorter than τ_(int)˜20 or30 seconds (see FIG. 9 below and comments therein).

[0090] “QT- and RR-data set” refers to a record of the time course of anelectrical signal comprising action potentials spreading through cardiacmuscle. Any single lead ECG record incorporates a group of threeconsecutive sharp deflections usually called a QRS complex and generatedby the propagation of the action potential's front through theventricles. In contrast, the electrical recovery of ventricular tissueis seen on the ECG as a relatively small deflection known as the T wave.The time interval between the cardiac cycles (i.e., between the maximaof the consecutive R-waves) is called an RR-interval, while the actionpotential duration (i.e., the time between the beginning of a QRScomplex and the end of the ensuing T-wave) is called a QT-interval.Alternative definitions of these intervals can be equivalently used inthe framework of the present invention. For example, an RR-interval canbe defined as the time between any two similar points, such as thesimilar inflection points, on two consecutive R-waves, or any other wayto measure cardiac cycle length. A QT-interval can be defined as thetime interval between the peak of the Q-wave and the peak of the T wave.It can also be defined as the time interval between the beginning (orthe center) of the Q-wave and the end of the ensuing T-wave defined asthe point on the time axis (the base line) at which it intersects withthe linear extrapolation of the T-wave's falling branch and started fromits inflection point, or any other way to measure action potentialduration. An ordered set of such interval durations simultaneously withthe time instants of their beginnings or ends which are accumulated on abeat to beat basis or on any given beat sampling rate basis form acorresponding QT- and RR-interval data set. Thus, a QT- and RR-intervaldata set will contain two QT-interval related sequences {T_(QT,1),T_(QT,2), . . . , T_(QT,n),} and {t₁, t₂, . . . , t_(n)}, and will alsocontain two RR-interval related sequences {T_(RR,1), T_(RR,2), . . . ,T_(RR,n),} and {t₁, t₂, . . . , t_(n)} (the sequence {t₁, t₂, . . . ,t_(n)} may or may not exactly coincide with the similar sequence in theQT data set).

[0091] In the following definitions, C[a,b] shall denote a set ofcontinuous functions f(t) on a segment [a,b]. {t₁}, i=1,2, . . . , N,denotes a set of points from [a,b], i.e. {t_(i)}={t_(i): a≦t_(i)≦b, i=1,2, . . . , N} and {f(t_(i))}, where fεC[a,b], denotes a set of values ofthe function fat the points {t_(i)}. In matrix operations the quantitiesr={t_(i)}, y={f(t_(i))}, are treated as column vectors. E_(N) shalldenote a N-dimensional metric space with the metric R_(N)(x,y),x,yεE_(N). (R_(N)(x,y) is said to be a distance between points x and y.)A (total) variation $\overset{b}{\underset{a}{V}}\lbrack F\rbrack$

[0092] is defined for any absolutely continuous function F from C[a,b]as the integral (a Stieltjes integral) $\begin{matrix}{ {{\underset{a}{\overset{b}{V}}\lbrack {F(t)} \rbrack} \equiv \int\limits_{a}^{b}} \middle| {{F(t)}} | = {\int\limits_{a}^{b}| {F^{\prime}(t)} \middle| {{t}.} }} & \text{(D.1)}\end{matrix}$

[0093] For a function F monotonic on segment [a,b] its variation issimply |F(a)−F(b)|. If a function F(t) has alternating maxima andminima, then the total variation of F is the sum of its variations onthe intervals of monotonicity. For example, if the points of minima andmaxima are x₁=a, x₂, x₃, . . . , x_(k)=b then $\begin{matrix}{{\underset{a}{\overset{b}{V}}\lbrack {F(t)} \rbrack} = {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{k - 1}| {{F( x_{i} )} - {F( x_{i + 1} )}}| .  }} & \text{(D.2)}\end{matrix}$

[0094] Fitting (Best Fitting):

[0095] Let {tilde over (C)}[a,b] be a subset of C[a,b]. A continuousfunction f(t), fε{tilde over (C)}[a,b] is called the (best) fit (or thebest fitting) function of class {tilde over (C)}[a,b] with respect tometric R_(N) to a data set {x_(i),t_(i)} (i=1, 2, . . . , N} if$\begin{matrix}{{R_{N}( {\{ {f( t_{i} )} \},\{ x_{i} \}} )} = \min\limits_{f \in {\overset{\sim}{C}{\lbrack{a,b}\rbrack}}}} & \text{(D.3)}\end{matrix}$

[0096] The minimum value of R_(N) is then called the error of the fit.The functions f(t) from {tilde over (C)}[a,b] will be called trialfunctions.

[0097] In most cases E_(N) is implied to be an Euclidean space with anEuclidean metric. The error R_(N) then becomes the familiarmean-root-square error. The fit is performed on a subset {tilde over(C)}[a,b] since it usually implies a specific parametrization of thetrial functions and/or such constrains as the requirements that thetrial functions pass through a given point and/or have a given value ofthe slope at a given point.

[0098] A Smoother Function (Comparison of Smoothness):

[0099] Let f(t) and g(t) be functions from C[a,b] that have absolutelycontinuous derivatives on this segment. The function f(t) is smootherthan the function g(t) if $\begin{matrix}{{{\underset{a}{\overset{b}{V}}\lbrack {f(t)} \rbrack} \leq {\underset{a}{\overset{b}{V}}\lbrack {g(t)} \rbrack}},{and}} & \text{(D.4)} \\{{{\underset{a}{\overset{b}{V}}\lbrack {f^{\prime}(t)} \rbrack} \leq {\underset{a}{\overset{b}{V}}\lbrack {g^{\prime}(t)} \rbrack}},} & \text{(D.5)}\end{matrix}$

[0100] and

[0101] where the prime denotes a time derivative, and a strictinequality holds in at least one of relations (D.4) and (D.5).

[0102] A Smoother Set:

[0103] A set {x_(i),t_(i)} (i=1, 2, . . . , N} is smoother than the set{x′_(j),t′_(j)} (j=1, 2, . . . , N′} if the former can be fit with asmoother function f(t) of the same class within the same or smallererror than the latter.

[0104] Smoothing of a Data Set:

[0105] A (linear) transformation of a data set (x,t)≡{x_(i),t_(i)} (i=1,2, . . . , N₀} into another set (y,τ)≡{y_(j),τ_(j)} (i=1, 2, . . . , N₁}of the form

y=A·x, τ=B·t,  (D.6)

[0106] where A and B are N₁×N₀ matrices, is called a smoothing if thelatter set is smoother than the former. One can refer to {y_(j),τ_(j)}as a smoothed set

[0107] A Measure of a Closed Domain:

[0108] Let Ω be a singly connected domain on the plane (τ,T) with theboundary formed by a simple (i.e., without self-intersections)continuous curve. A measure M of such a domain Ω on the plane (τ,T) isdefined as the Riemann integral $\begin{matrix}{M = {\int_{\Omega}{\int{{\rho ( {\tau,T} )}{\tau}{T}}}}} & \text{(D.7)}\end{matrix}$

[0109] where ρ(τ,T) is a nonnegative (weight) function on Ω.

[0110] Note that when ρ(τ,T)≡1 the measure M of the domain coincideswith its area, A; when ρ(τ,T)≡1/τ², the measure, M, has the meaning ofthe area, A′, of the domain Ω′ on the transformed plane (f,T), wheref=1/τ can be understood as the heart rate since the quantity τ has themeaning of RR-interval. [The domain Ω′ is the image of domain Ω underthe mapping (τ,T)→(1/τ,T).]

[0111] 2. Dispersion/Restitution Curves.

[0112]FIG. 1 illustrates the correspondence between the temporal phasesof the periodic action potential (AP, upper graph, 20) generated insidecardiac muscle and summed up over its entire volume and the electricalsignal produced on the body surface and recorded as an electrocardiogram(ECG, lower graph, 21). The figure depicts two regular cardiac cycles.During the upstroke of the action potential the QRS-complex is formed.It consists of three waves, Q, R, and S, which are marked on the lowerpanel. The recovery stage of the action potential is characterized byits fall off on the AP plot and by the T-wave on the ECG plot. One cansee that the action potential duration is well represented by the timebetween Q and T waves and is conventionally defined as the QT interval,measured from the beginning of the Q wave to the end of the following Twave. The time between consecutive R-waves (RR interval) represents theduration of a cardiac cycle, while its reciprocal value represents thecorresponding instantaneous heart rate.

[0113]FIG. 2 illustrates major aspects of the process of propagation ofa periodic action potential through cardiac tissue and the formation ofa corresponding composite dispersion-restitution curve. The tissue canbe considered as a continuous medium and the propagation process as arepetition at each medium point of the consecutive phases of excitationand recovery. The former phase is characterized by a fast growth of thelocal membrane potential (depolarization), and the latter by its returnto a negative resting value (repolarization). The excitation phaseinvolves a very fast (˜0.1 ms) decrease in the excitation threshold andthe following development of a fast inward sodium current that causesthe upstroke of the action potential (˜1 ms). Next, during anintermediate plateau phase (˜200 ms) sodium current is inactivated;calcium and potassium currents are developing while the membrane istemporarily unexcitable (i.e., the threshold is high). During the nextrecovery phase (˜100 ms), a potassium current repolarizes the membraneso it again becomes excitable (the excitation threshold is lowered).

[0114] The complicated description of a multitude of ionic currentsinvolved in the process can be circumvented if one treats the processdirectly in terms of the local membrane potential, u, and a localexcitation threshold, v. Such a mathematical description referred to asthe CSC model, was developed by Chernyak, Starobin, & Cohen (Phys. Rev.Lett., 80, pp.5675-5678, 1998) and is presented as a set of twoReaction-Diffusion (RD) equations in panel A. The left-hand side of thefirst equation describes local accumulation of the electric charge onthe membrane, the first term in the right-hand side describes Ohmiccoupling between neighboring points of the medium, and the term i(u,v)represents the transmembrane current as a function of the membranepotential and the varying excitation threshold (ε is a small constant,the ratio of the slow recovery rate to the fast excitation rate). Aperiodic solution (a wave-train) can be found analytically for someparticular functions i(u)v) and g(u,v). The wave-train shown in panel Bhas been calculated for g(u,v)=ζu+v_(r)−v, where ζ and v_(r) areappropriately chosen constants (v_(r) has the meaning of the initialexcitation threshold and is the main determinant of the mediumexcitability). The function i(u,v) was chosen to consist of two linearpieces, one for the sub-threshold region, u<v, and one forsupra-threshold region, u>v. That is i(u,v)=λ_(r)u when u≦v, andi(u,v)=λ_(ex)(u−u_(ex)) when u>v, where λ_(r) and λ_(ex) are membranechord conductances in the resting (u=0) and excited (u=u_(ex)) states,respectively. The resting state u=0 is taken as the origin of thepotential scale. We used such units that λ_(ex)=1 and u_(ex)=1. (Fordetails see Chernyak & Starobin, Critical Reviews in Biomed. Eng. 27,359-414 (1999)).

[0115] A medium with higher excitability, corresponding to the tissuewith better conduction, gives rise to a faster, more robust actionpotential with a longer Action Potential Duration (APD). This conditionalso means that a longer-lasting excitation propagates faster.Similarly, a wave train with a higher frequency propagates slower sincethe medium has less time to recover from the preceding excitation andthus has a lower effective excitability. These are quite genericfeatures that are incorporated in the CSC model. In physics, therelation between the wave's speed, c, and its frequency, f or itsperiod, T=1/f, is called a dispersion relation. In the CSC model thedispersion relation can be obtained in an explicit form T=F_(T)(c),where F_(T) is a known function of c and the medium parameters. The CSCmodel also allows us to find a relation between the propagation speedand the APD, T_(AP), in the explicit form T_(AP)=F_(AP)(c), whichrepresents the restitution properties of the medium. In the medicalliterature, the restitution curve is T_(AP) versus diastolic intervalT_(DI), which differently makes a quite similar physical statement. Onecan consider a pair of dispersion and restitution relations{T=F_(T)(c),T_(AP)=F_(AP)(c)} as a parametric representation of a singlecurve on the (T,T_(AP))-plane as shown in panel C (FIG. 2). Such a curve(relation) shall be referred to as a composite dispersion-restitutioncurve (relation) and can be directly obtained from an experimental ECGrecording by determining the QT-RR interval data set and plotting T_(QT)versus T_(RR). A condition that the experimental {T_(QT),T_(RR)} dataset indeed represents the composite dispersion-restitution relation isthe requirement that the data are collected under quasi-stationaryconditions. Understanding this fact is a key discovery for the presentinvention.

[0116] 3. Testing Methods.

[0117] The methods of the present invention are primarily intended forthe testing of human subjects. Virtually any human subject can be testedby the methods of the present invention, including male, female,juvenile, adolescent, adult, and geriatric subjects. The methods may becarried out as an initial screening test on subjects for which nosubstantial previous history or record is available, or may be carriedout on a repeated basis on the same subject (particularly where acomparative quantitative indicium of an individual's cardiac health overtime is desired) to assess the effect or influence of intervening eventsand/or intervening therapy on that subject between testing sessions.

[0118] As noted above, the method of the present invention generallycomprises (a) collecting a first QT- and RR-interval data set from saidsubject during a stage of gradually increasing heart rate; (b)collecting a second QT- and RR-interval data set from said subjectduring a stage of gradually decreasing heart rate; (c) comparing saidfirst QT- and RR-interval data set to said second QT- and RR-intervaldata set to determine the difference between said data sets; and (d)generating from said comparison of step (c) a measure of cardiacischemia in the subject. A greater difference between the first andsecond data sets indicates greater cardiac ischemia and lesser cardiacor cardiovascular health in that subject.

[0119] The stages of gradually increasing and gradually decreasing heartrate are carried out in a manner that maintains during both periodsessentially or substantially the same stimulation of the heart by theperipheral nervous and hormonal control systems, so that it is theeffect of cardiac ischemia rather than that of the external controlwhich is measured by means of the present invention. This methodologycan be carried out by a variety of techniques, with the technique ofconducting two consecutive stages of gradually increasing and graduallydecreasing exercise loads (or average heart rates) being currentlypreferred.

[0120] The stage of gradually increasing exercise load (or increasedaverage heart rate) and the stage of gradually decreasing exercise load(or decreased average heart rate) may be the same in duration or may bedifferent in duration. In general, each stage is at least 3, 5, 8, or 10minutes or more in duration. Together, the duration of the two stagesmay be from about 6, 10, 16 or 20 minutes in duration to about 30, 40,or 60 minutes in duration or more. The two stages are preferably carriedout sequentially in time—that is, with one stage following after theother substantially immediately, without an intervening rest stage. Inthe alternative, the two stages may be carried out separately in time,with an intervening “plateau” stage (e.g., of from 1 to 5 minutes)during which cardiac stimulation or exercise load is held substantiallyconstant, before the stage of decreasing load is initiated. In aparticular embodiment discussed below, where the subject is afflictedwith coronary artery disease, a stage of gradually decreasing exerciseload may be considered to take place during the period following anabrupt stop in exercise.

[0121] The exercise protocol may include the same or different sets ofload steps during the stages of increasing or decreasing heart rates.For example, the peak load in each stage may be the same or different,and the minimum load in each stage may be the same or different. Ingeneral, each stage consists of at least two or three different loadlevels, in ascending or descending order depending upon the stage.Relatively high load levels, which result in relatively high heartrates, can be used but are not essential. An advantage of the presentinvention is that its sensitivity allows both exercise procedures to becarried out at relatively low load levels that do not unduly increasethe pulse rate of the subject. For example, the method may be carriedout so that the heart rate of the subject during either the ascending ordescending stage (or both) does not exceed about 140, 120, or even 100beats per minute, depending upon the condition of the subject. Ofcourse, data collected at heart rates above 100, 120, or 140 beats perminute may also be utilized if desired, again depending upon thecondition of the subject.

[0122] For example, for an athletic or trained subject, for the first orascending stage, a first load level may be selected to require a poweroutput of 60 to 100 or 150 watts by the subject; an intermediate loadlevel may be selected to require a power output of 100 to 150 or 200watts by the subject; and a third load level may be selected to requirea power output of 200 to 300 or 450 watts or more by the subject. Forthe second or descending stage, a first load level may be selected torequire a power output of 200 to 300 or 450 watts or more by thesubject; an intermediate or second load level may be selected to requirea power output of 100 to 150 or 200 watts by the subject; and a thirdload level may be selected to require a power output of 60 to 100 or 150watts by the subject. Additional load levels may be included before,after, or between all of the foregoing load levels as desired, andadjustment between load levels can be carried out in any suitablemanner, including step-wise or continuously.

[0123] In a farther example, for an average subject or a subject with ahistory of cardiovascular disease, for the first or ascending stage, afirst load level may be selected to require a power output of 40 to 75or 100 watts by the subject; an intermediate load level may be selectedto require a power output of 75 to 100 or 150 watts by the subject; anda third load level may be selected to require a power output of 125 to200 or 300 watts or more by the subject. For the second or descendingstage, a first load level may be selected to require a power output of125 to 200 or 300 watts or more by the subject; an intermediate orsecond load level may be selected to require a power output of 75 to 100or 150 watts by the subject; and a third load level may be selected torequire a power output of 40 to 75 or 100 watts by the subject. Asbefore, additional load levels may be included before, after, or betweenall of the foregoing load levels as desired, and adjustment between loadlevels can be carried out in any suitable manner, including step-wise orcontinuously.

[0124] The heart rate may be gradually increased and gradually decreasedby subjecting the patient to a predetermined schedule of stimulation.For example, the patient may be subjected to a gradually increasingexercise load and gradually decreasing exercise load, or graduallyincreasing electrical or pharmacological stimulation and graduallydecreasing electrical or pharmacological stimulation, according to apredetermined program or schedule. Such a predetermined schedule iswithout feedback of actual heart rate from the patient. In thealternative, the heart rate of the patient may be gradually increasedand gradually decreased in response to actual heart rate data collectedfrom concurrent monitoring of said patient. Such a system is a feedbacksystem. For example, the heart rate of the patient may be monitoredduring the test and the exercise load (speed and/or incline, in the caseof a treadmill) can be adjusted so that the heart rate varies in aprescribed way during both stages of the test. The monitoring andcontrol of the load can be accomplished by a computer or other controlsystem using a simple control program and an output panel connected tothe control system and to the exercise device that generates an analogsignal to the exercise device. One advantage of such a feedback systemis that (if desired) the control system can insure that the heart rateincreases substantially linearly during the first stage and decreasessubstantially linearly during the second stage.

[0125] The generating step (d) may be carried out by any suitable means,such as by generating curves from the data sets (with or withoutactually displaying the curves), and then (i) directly or indirectlyevaluating a measure (e.g., as defined in the integral theory) of thedomain (e.g., area) between the hysteresis curves, a greater measureindicating greater cardiac ischemia in said subject, (ii) directly orindirectly comparing the shapes (e.g., slopes or derivatives thereof) ofthe curves, with a greater difference in shape indicating greatercardiac ischemia in the subject; or (iii) combinations of (i) and (ii).Specific examples are given in Example 4 below.

[0126] The method of the invention may further comprise the steps of (e)comparing the measure of cardiac ischemia during exercise to at leastone reference value (e.g., a mean, median or mode for the quantitativeindicia from a population or subpopulation of individuals) and then (ogenerating from the comparison of step (e) at least one quantitativeindicium of cardiovascular health for said subject. Any suchquantitative indicium may be generated on a one-time basis (e.g., forassessing the likelihood that the subject is at risk to experience afuture ischemia-related cardiac incident such as myocardial infarctionor ventricular tachycardia), or may be generated to monitor the progressof the subject over time, either in response to a particular prescribedcardiovascular therapy, or simply as an ongoing monitoring of thephysical condition of the subject for improvement or decline (again,specific examples are given in Example 4 below). In such a case, steps(a) through (f) above are repeated on at least one separate occasion toassess the efficacy of the cardiovascular therapy or the progress of thesubject. A decrease in the difference between said data sets from beforesaid therapy to after said therapy, or over time, indicates animprovement in cardiac health in said subject from said cardiovasculartherapy. Any suitable cardiovascular therapy can be administered,including but not limited to, aerobic exercise, muscle strengthbuilding, change in diet, nutritional supplement, weight loss, smokingcessation, stress reduction, pharmaceutical treatment (including genetherapy), surgical treatment (including both open heart and closed heartprocedures such as bypass, balloon angioplasty, catheter ablation, etc.)and combinations thereof.

[0127] The therapy or therapeutic intervention may be one that isapproved or one that is experimental. In the latter case, the presentinvention may be implemented in the context of a clinical trial of theexperimental therapy, with testing being carried out before and aftertherapy (and/or during therapy) as an aid in determining the efficacy ofthe proposed therapy.

[0128] 4. Testing Apparatus.

[0129]FIG. 3 provides an example of the apparatus for data acquisition,processing and analysis by the present invention. Electrocardiograms arerecorded by an ECG recorder 30, via electrical leads placed on asubject's body. The ECG recorder may be, for example, a standardmulti-lead Holter recorder or any other appropriate recorder. Theanalog/digital converter 31 digitizes the signals recorded by the ECGrecorder and transfers them to a personal computer 32, or other computeror central processing unit, through a standard external input/outputport. The digitized ECG data can then be processed by standardcomputer-based waveform analyzer software. Compositedispersion-restitution curves and a cardiac or cardiovascular healthindicium or other quantitative measure of the presence, absence ordegree of cardiac ischemia can then be calculated automatically in thecomputer through a program (e.g., Basic, Fortran, C++, etc.) implementedtherein as software, hardware, or both hardware and software.

[0130]FIG. 4A and FIG. 4B illustrate the major steps of digitized dataprocessing in order to generate an analysis of a QT-RR data setcollected from a subject during there-and-back quasi-stationary changesin physiological conditions. The first four steps in FIG. 4A and FIG. 4Bare substantially the same. The digitized data collected from amulti-lead recorder are stored in a computer memory for each lead as adata array 40 a, 40 b. The size of each data array is determined by thedurations of the ascending and descending heart rate stages and asampling rate used by the waveform analyzer, which processes an incomingdigitized ECG signal. The waveform analyzer software first detects majorcharacteristic waves (Q,R,S and T waves) of the ECG signal in eachparticular lead 41 a, 41 b. Then in each ECG lead it determines the timeintervals between consecutive R waves and the beginning of Q and the endof T waves 42 a, 42 b. Using these reference points it calculates heartrate and RR- and QT-intervals. Then, the application part of thesoftware sorts the intervals for the ascending and descending heart ratestages 43 a, 43 b. The next two steps can be made in one of the twoalternative ways shown in FIGS. 4A and 4B, respectively. The fifth stepas shown in FIG. 4A consists of displaying by the application part ofsoftware QT-intervals versus RR-intervals 44 a, separately for theascending and descending heart rate stages effected by there-and-backgradual changes in physiological conditions such as exercise,pharmacological/electrical stimulation, etc. The same part of thesoftware performs the next step 45 a, which is smoothing, filtering ordata fitting, using exponential or any other suitable functions, inorder to obtain a sufficiently smooth curve T_(QT)=F(T_(RR)) for eachstage. An alternative for the last two steps shown in FIG. 4B requiresthat the application part of the software first averages, and/or filtersand/or fits, using exponential or any other suitable functions, the QTintervals as functions of time for both stages and similarly processesthe RR-interval data set to produce two sufficiently smooth curvesT_(QT)=F_(QT)(t) and T_(RR)=F_(RR)(t), each including the ascending anddescending heart rate branches 44 b. At the next step 45 b theapplication part of the software uses this parametric representation toeliminate time and generate and plot a sufficiently smooth hysteresisloop T_(QT)=F(T_(RR)). The following steps shown in FIGS. 4A and FIG. 4Bare again substantially the same. The next step 46 a, 46 b performed bythe application part of the software can be graphically presented asclosing the two branch hysteresis loop with an appropriateinterconnecting or partially connecting line, such as a verticalstraight line or a line connecting the initial and final points, inorder to produce a closed hysteresis loop on the (T_(QT), T_(RR))-plane.At the next step 47 a, 47 b the application software evaluates for eachECG lead an appropriate measure of the domain inside the closedhysteresis loop. A measure, as defined in mathematical integral theory,is a generalization of the concept of an area and may includeappropriate weight functions increasing or decreasing the contributionof different portions of the domain into said measure. The final step 48a, 48 b of the data processing for each ECG lead is that the applicationsoftware calculates indexes by appropriately renormalizing the saidmeasure or any monotonous functions of said measure. The measure itselfalong with the indexes may reflect both the severity of theexercise-induced ischemia, as well as a predisposition to local ischemiathat can be reflected in some particularities of the shape of themeasured composite dispersion-restitution curves. The results of allabove-mentioned signal processing steps may be used to quantitativelyassess cardiac ischemia and, as a simultaneous option, cardiovascularsystem health of a particular individual under test.

[0131] Instead of using the (T_(QT),T_(RR))-plane a similar dataprocessing procedure can equivalently be performed on any plane obtainedby a non-degenerate transformation of the (T_(QT),T_(RR))-plane, such as(T_(QT),f_(RR)) where f_(RR)=1/T_(RR) is the heart rate or the like.Such a transformation can be partly or fully incorporated in theappropriate definition of the said measure.

[0132] 5. Conditions Under Which an Abrupt Stop Exercise Protocol can beConsidered as a Quasi-Stationary Protocol.

[0133] In general, each stage of gradually increasing and decreasingquasi-stationary exercise protocol is at least 3, 5, 8, or 10 minutes induration. Each stage's duration is approximately an order of magnitudelonger than the average duration (1 minute) of heart rate (HR)adjustment during an abrupt stop of the exercise between average peakload rate (˜120˜150 beat/min) and average rest (˜50˜70 beat/min) heartrate values.

[0134] One should note that the ˜1 minute HR adjustment period after anabrupt stop of exercise is typical only for healthy individuals andthose with not more than a relatively moderate level of coronary arterydisease. However, due to rapid development of massive exercise-inducedischemia for individuals with a pronounced coronary artery disease levelthe same adjustment period can be significantly longer—up to 10 minutesor more in duration. In these cases the HR deviations (described in theexample 9 below) are small and indicate that such an ill patient remainsunder a significant physical stress even after an abrupt stop ofexercise, without further exercise load exposure. In such cases aphysician must usually interrupt the protocol prior to completion of afull quasi-stationary exercise regimen. However, under these conditionsa recovery portion of the QT/RR hysteresis loop, as well as a loopformed after an abrupt stop of exercise, can be considered as thequasi-stationary loop. Indeed, a slow heart rate recovery to a levelequal to HR prior to the exercise takes 3, 5, 8, 10 or more minutes induration with small HR deviations and, therefore, still satisfies theunderlying definition of a gradual exercise protocol (see example 9,below).

[0135] Thus, for ill patients afflicted with coronary artery disease, anabrupt stop of exercise does not prevent the completion of the method ofthe present invention, since due to a prolonged HR recovery stage anindicium of cardiac or cardiovascular health can still be calculated asa quasi-stationary loop index without a completion of a full exerciseprotocol.

[0136] Note that typically a patient with a distinguished coronaryartery disease level, as determined by physical exhaustion, shortness ofbreath, chest pain, and/or some other clinical symptom, is unable toexercise longer than 3, 5, 8 or 10 or more minutes at even a low-levelpower output of about 20 watts. A gradual recovery process followed theabrupt stop of such exercise in such patients satisfies the definitionof a quasi-stationary process as given herein (see, e.g., Example 9).Note that patients with moderate levels of coronary artery disease canexercise longer, up to 20 minutes or more, and may be exposed tosignificantly higher exercise workouts ranging from 50 to 300 watts.

[0137] The present invention is explained in greater detail in thenon-limiting examples set forth below.

EXAMPLE 1 Testing Apparatus

[0138] A testing apparatus consistent with FIG. 3 was assembled. Theelectrocardiograms are recorded by an RZ152PM12 Digital ECG HolterRecorder (ROZINN ELECTRONICS, INC.; 71-22 Myrtle Av., Glendale, N.Y.,USA 11385-7254), via 12 electrical leads with Lead-Lok Holter/StressTest Electrodes LL510 (LEAD-LOK, INC.; 500 Airport Way, P.O.Box L,Sandpoint, Id., USA 83864) placed on a subject's body in accordance withthe manufacturer's instructions. Digital ECG data are transferred to apersonal computer (Dell Dimension XPS T500 MHz/Windows 98) using a 40 MBflash card (RZFC40) with a PC 700 flash card reader, both from RozinnElectronics, Inc. Holter for Windows (4.0.25) waveform analysis softwareis installed in the computer, which is used to process data by astandard computer based waveform analyzer software. Compositedispersion-restitution curves and an indicium that provides aquantitative characteristic of the extent of cardiac ischemia are thencalculated manually or automatically in the computer through a programimplemented in Fortran 90.

[0139] Experimental data were collected during an exercise protocolprogrammed in a Landice L7 Executive Treadmill (Landice Treadmills; 111Canfield Av., Randolph, N.J. 07869). The programmed protocol included 20step-wise intervals of a constant exercise load from 48 seconds to 1.5minutes each in duration. Altogether these intervals formed twoequal-in-duration gradually increasing and gradually decreasing exerciseload stages, with total duration varying from 16 to 30 minutes. For eachstage a treadmill belt speed and elevation varied there-and-back,depending on the subject's age and health conditions, from 1.5 miles perhour to 5.5 miles per hour and from one to ten degrees of treadmillelevation, respectively.

EXAMPLES 2-6 Human Hysteresis Curve Studies

[0140] These examples illustrate quasi-stationary ischemia-induced QT-RRinterval hystereses in a variety of different human subjects. These datademonstrate a high sensitivity and the high resolution of the method.

EXAMPLES 2-3 Hysteresis Curves in Healthy Male Subjects of DifferentAges

[0141] These examples were carried out on two male subjects with anapparatus and procedure as described in Example 1 above. Referring toFIG. 5, one can readily see a significant difference in areas ofhystereses between two generally healthy male subjects of differentages. These subjects (23 and 47 years old) exercised on a treadmillaccording to a quasi-stationary 30-minute protocol with graduallyincreasing and gradually decreasing exercise load. Here squares andcircles (thick line) indicate a hysteresis loop for the 23 year oldsubject, and diamonds and triangles (thin line) correspond to a largerloop for the 47 year old subject. Fitting curves are obtained using thethird-order polynomial functions. A beat sampling rate with which awaveform analyzer determines QT and RR intervals is equal to one sampleper minute. Neither of the subjects had a conventional ischemia-induceddepression of the ECG-ST segments. However, the method of the presentinvention allows one to observe ischemia-induced hystereses that providea satisfactory resolution within a conventionally sub-threshold range ofischemic events and allows one to quantitatively differentiate betweenthe hystereses of the two subjects.

EXAMPLES 4-5 Hysteresis Curves for Subjects with ST Segment Depressionor Prior Cardiac Infarction

[0142] These examples were carried out on two 55-year-old male subjectswith an apparatus and procedure as described in Example 1 above. FIG. 6illustrates quasi-stationary QT-RR interval hystereses for the malesubjects. The curves fitted to the squares and empty circles relate tothe first individual and illustrate a case of cardiac ischemia alsodetectable by the conventional ECG-ST segment depression technique. Thecurves fitted to the diamonds and triangles relate to the other subject,an individual who previously had experienced a myocardial infarction.These subjects exercised on a treadmill according to a quasi-stationary20-minute protocol with a gradually increasing and gradually decreasingexercise load. Fitting curves are obtained using third-order polynomialfunctions. These cases demonstrate that the method of the presentinvention allows one to resolve and quantitatively characterize thedifference between (1) levels of ischemia that can be detected by theconventional ST depression method, and (2) low levels of ischemia(illustrated in FIG. 5) that are subthreshold for the conventionalmethod and therefore undetectable by it. The levels of exercise-inducedischemia reported in FIG. 5 are significantly lower than those shown inFIG. 6. This fact illustrates insufficient resolution of a conventionalST depression method in comparison with the method of the presentinvention.

EXAMPLE 6 Hysteresis Curves in the Same Subject Before and After aRegular Exercise Regimen

[0143] This example was carried out with an apparatus and procedure asdescribed in Example 1 above. FIG. 7 provides examples ofquasi-stationary hystereses for a 55 year-old male subject before andafter he engaged in a practice of regular aerobic exercise. Bothexperiments were performed according to the same quasi-stationary20-minute protocol with a gradually increasing and gradually decreasingexercise load. Fitting curves are obtained using third-order polynomialfunctions. The first test shows a pronounced exercise-induced cardiacischemic event developed near the peak level of exercise load, detectedby both the method of the present invention and a conventional ECG-STdepression method. The maximum heart rate reached during the first test(before a regular exercise regimen was undertaken) was equal to 146.After a course of regular exercise the subject improved hiscardiovascular health, which can be conventionally roughly,qualitatively, estimated by a comparison of peak heart rates. Indeed,the maximum heart rate at the peak exercise load from the firstexperiment to the second decreased by 16.4%, declining from 146 to 122.A conventional ST segment method also indicates the absence of STdepression, but did not provide any quantification of such animprovement since this ischemic range is sub-threshold for the method.Unlike such a conventional method, the method of the present inventiondid provide such quantification. Applying the current invention, thecurves in FIG. 7 developed from the second experiment show that the areaof a quasi-stationary, QT-RR interval hysteresis decreased significantlyfrom the first experiment, and such hysteresis loop indicated that somelevel of exercise-induced ischemia still remained. A change in the shapeof the observed composite dispersion-restitution curves also indicatesan improvement since it changed from a flatter curve, similar to theflatter curves (with a lower excitability and a higher threshold,v_(r)=0.3 to 0.35) in FIG. 2, to a healthier (less ischemic) moreconvex-shape curve, which is similar to the lower threshold curves(v_(r)=0.2 to 0.25) in FIG. 2. Thus, FIG. 7 demonstrates that, due toits high sensitivity and high resolution, the method of the presentinvention can be used in the assessment of delicate alterations inlevels of cardiac ischemia, indicating changes of cardiovascular healthwhen treated by a conventional cardiovascular intervention.

EXAMPLE 7 Calculation of a Quantitative Indicium of CardiovascularHealth

[0144] This example was carried out with the data obtained in Examples2-6 above. FIG. 8 illustrates a comparative cardiovascular healthanalysis based on ischemia assessment by the method of the presentinvention. In this example an indicium of cardiovascular health (heredesignated the cardiac ischemia index and abbreviated “CII”) wasdesigned, which was defined as a quasi-stationary QT-RR intervalhysteresis loop area, S, normalized by dividing it by the product(T_(RR,max)−T_(RR,min))(T_(QT,max)−T_(QT,min)). For each particularsubject this factor corrects the area for individual differences in theactual ranges of QT and RR intervals occurring during the tests underthe quasi-stationary treadmill exercise protocol. We determined minimumand maximum CII in a sample of fourteen exercise tests and derived anormalized index <CII>=(CII−CII_(min))/(CII_(max)−CII_(min)) varyingfrom 0 to 1. Alterations of <CII> in different subjects show that themethod of the present invention allows one to resolve and quantitativelycharacterize different levels of cardiac and cardiovascular health in aregion in which the conventional ST depression method is sub-thresholdand is unable to detect any exercise-induced ischemia. Thus, unlike arough conventional ST-segment depression ischemic evaluation, the methodof the present invention offers much more accurate assessing andmonitoring of small variations of cardiac ischemia and associatedchanges of cardiac or cardiovascular health.

EXAMPLE 8 Illustration of Rapid Sympatho-Adrenal Transients

[0145]FIG. 9 illustrates a typical rapid sympathetic/parasympatheticnervous and hormonal adjustment of the QT (panels A, C) and RR (panelsB,D) intervals to an abrupt stop after 10 minutes of exercise withincreasing exercise load. All panels depict temporal variations of QT/RRintervals obtained from the right precordial lead V3 of the 12-leadmulti-lead electrocardiogram. A sampling rate with which a waveformanalyzer determined QT and RR intervals was equal to 15 samples perminute. A human subject (a 47 years-old male) was at rest the first 10minutes and then began to exercise with gradually (during 10 minutes)increasing exercise load (Panels A, B—to the left from the RR, QTminima). Then at the peak of the exercise load (heart rate about 120beat/min) the subject stepped off the treadmill in order to initializethe fastest RR and QT interval's adaptation to a complete abrupt stop ofthe exercise load. He rested long enough (13 minutes) in order to insurethat QT and RR intervals reached post-exercise average stationaryvalues. Panels C and D demonstrate that the fastest rate of change of QTand RR intervals occurred immediately after the abrupt stop of theexercise load. These rates are about 0.015 s/min for QT intervals whilethey vary from 0.28 s to 0.295 s and about 0.15 s/min for RR intervalswhile they grow from 0.45 s to 0.6 s. Based on the above-describedexperiment, a definition for “rapid sympatho-adrenal and hormonaltransients” or “rapid autonomic nervous system and hormonal transients”may be given.

[0146] Rapid transients due to autonomic nervous system and hormonalcontrol refer to the transients with the rate of 0.15 s/min for RRintervals, which corresponds to the heart rate's rate of change of about25 beat/min, and 0.02 s/min for QT intervals or faster rates of changein RR/QT intervals in response to a significant abrupt change (stop orincrease) in exercise load (or other cardiac stimulus). The significantabrupt changes in exercise load are defined here as the load variationswhich cause rapid variations in RR/QT intervals, comparable in size withthe entire range from the exercise peak to the stationary average restvalues.

EXAMPLE 9 Illustration of a Quasi-Stationary Exercise Protocol

[0147]FIG. 10 illustrates a typical slow (quasi-stationary) QT (panel A)and RR (panel B) interval adjustment measured during graduallyincreasing and gradually decreasing exercise load in a right pre-cordialV3 lead of the 12 lead electrocardiogram recording. The sampling was 15QT and RR intervals per minute. A male subject exercised during twoconsecutive 10 minute long stages of gradually increasing and graduallydecreasing exercise load. Both QT and RR intervals gradually approachedthe minimal values at about a peak exercise load (peak heart rate ˜120beat/min) and then gradually returned to levels that were slightly lowerthan their initial pre-exercise rest values. The evolution of QT and RRintervals was well approximated by exponential fitting curves shown ingray in panels A and B. The ranges for the QT-RR interval,there-and-back, time variations were 0.34 s-0.27 s-0.33 s (an averagerate of change ˜0.005 s/min) and 0.79 s-0.47 s-0.67 s (an average rateof change ˜0.032 s/min or ˜6 beat/min) for QT and RR intervals,respectively. The standard root-mean-square deviation, σ, of theobserved QT and RR intervals, shown by black dots in both panels, fromtheir exponential fits were on an order of magnitude smaller than theaverage difference between the corresponding peak and rest values duringthe entire test. These deviations were σ˜0.003 s for QT and σ˜0.03 s forRR intervals, respectively. According to FIG. 9 (panels C, D) such smallperturbations, when associated with abrupt heart rate changes due tophysiological fluctuations or due to discontinuity in an exercise load,may develop and decay faster than in 10 s, the time that is 60 timesshorter than the duration of one gradual (ascending or descending) stageof the exercise protocol. Such a significant difference between theamplitudes and time constants of the QT/RR interval gradual changes andabrupt heart rate fluctuations allows one to average these fluctuationsover time and fit the QT/RR protocol duration dynamics by an appropriatesmooth exponential-like function with a high order of accuracy. Asimultaneous fitting procedure (panels A, B) determines an algorithm ofa parametrical time dependence elimination from both measured QT/RR datasets and allows one to consider QT interval for each exercise stage as amonotonic function.

[0148] Based on the above-described experiment a definition for agradual, or “quasi-stationary” exercise (or stimulation) protocol, canbe quantitatively specified: A quasi-stationary exercise (orstimulation) protocol refers to two contiguous stages (each stage 3, 5,8 or 10 minutes or longer in duration) of gradually increasing andgradually decreasing exercise loads or stimulation, such as:

[0149] 1. Each stage's duration is approximately an order of magnitude(e.g., at least about ten times) longer than the average duration (˜1minute) of a heart rate adjustment during an abrupt stop of the exercisebetween average peak load rate (˜120-150 beat/min) and average rest(˜50-70 beat/min) heart rate values.

[0150] 2. The standard root-mean-square deviations of the original QT/RRinterval data set from their smooth and monotonic (for each stage) fitsare of an order of magnitude (e.g., at least about ten times) smallerthan the average differences between peak and rest QT/RR interval valuesmeasured during the entire exercise under the quasi-stationary protocol.

[0151] As shown above (FIG. 10) a gradual quasi-stationary protocolitself allows one to substantially eliminate abrupt time dependentfluctuations from measured QT/RR interval data sets because thesefluctuations have short durations and small amplitudes. Their effect canbe even further reduced by fitting each RR/QT interval data setcorresponding to each stage with a monotonic function of time. As aresult the fitted QT interval values during each exercise stage can bepresented as a substantially monotonic and smooth function of thequasi-stationary varying RR interval value. Presented on the(RR-interval, QT-interval)-plane this function gives rise to a loop,whose shape, area and other measures depend only weakly on the detailsof the quasi-stationary protocol, and is quite similar to the hysteresisloop presented in FIG. 2. Similar to a generic hysteresis loop, thisloop can be considered as primarily representing electrical conductionproperties of cardiac muscle.

[0152] It is well known that exercise-induced ischemia alters conditionsfor cardiac electrical conduction. If a particular individual has anexercise-induced ischemic event, then one can expect that the twoexperimental composite dispersion-restitution curves corresponding tothe ascending and descending stages of the quasi-stationary protocolwill be different and will form a specific quasi-stationary hysteresisloop. Since according to a quasi-stationary protocol the evolution ofthe average values of QT and RR intervals occurs quite slowly ascompared with the rate of the transients due tosympathetic/parasympathetic and hormonal control, the hysteresis looppractically does not depend on the peculiarities of the transients. Inthat case such a hysteresis can provide an excellent measure of gradualischemic exercise dependent changes in cardiac electrical conduction andcan reflect cardiac health itself and cardiovascular system health ingeneral.

[0153] It should be particularly emphasized that neither J. Sarma et al,supra, nor A. Krahn's et al. supra, report work based on collectingquasi-stationary dependences, which are similar to the QT-interval-RRinterval dependence, since in fact both studies were designed fordifferent purposes. To the contrary, they were intentionally based onnon-quasi-stationary exercise protocols that contained an abruptexercise stop at or near the peak of the exercise load. These protocolsgenerated a different type of QT/RR interval hysteresis loop with asubstantial presence of non-stationary sympatho-adrenal transients (seeFIG. 9 above). Thus these prior art examples did not and could notinclude data which would characterize gradual changes in the dispersionand restitution properties of cardiac electrical conduction, andtherefore included no substantial indication that could be attributed toexercise-induced ischemia.

EXAMPLES 10-12 Data Processing at Steps 44-45 a,b (FIGS. 4A and 4B)

[0154] The following Examples describe various specific embodiments forcarrying out the processing, shown in FIG. 4B, where the softwareimplemented at steps 44 b and 45 b performs the following major steps:

[0155] (i) Generates sufficiently smooth time dependent QT and RR datasets by averaging/filtering and fitting these averaged data byexponential or any other suitable functions;

[0156] (ii) Combines into pairs the points of RR and QT data sets thatcorrespond to the same time instants, thereby generating smooth QT/RRcurves for the ascending and descending heart rate stages (branches) onthe (T_(RR),T_(QT))-plane or a similar plane or its image in computermemory;

[0157] (iii) Closes the ends of the QT/RR curves to transform them intoa closed loop and determines an area, S, or a similar measure of thedomain confined by the said loop and computes an index to provide aquantitative characteristic of cardiovascular health in a human subjectbased on a measure of this domain.

[0158] Each of these three major steps may consist of several sub steps,as illustrated in each of the methods shown in FIG. 11, FIG. 13 and FIG.15, FIG. 16 and as discussed in greater detail below.

EXAMPLE 10 A Method of Optimized Consolidation of a Moving Average,Exponential and Polynomial Fitting

[0159] 1. Raw Data Averaging/Filtering (Box 1 in FIG. 11).

[0160] The raw data set consists of two subsets {t_(RR) ^(i),T_(RR)^(i)} i=1, 2, . . . N_(RR)−1, and {t_(QT) ^(i),T_(QT) ^(i)}, i=1, 2, . .. N_(QT)−1, where t_(x) ^(i) and T_(x) ^(i) denote the i-th samplingtime instant and the respective, RR or QT, interval duration (subsript xstands for RR or QT). In order to simplify the notation we shall omitthe subscripts RR and QT when it is applicable to both sub-samples. Itis convenient to represent each data point as a two-component vectoru_(i)=(t^(i),T^(i)). The filtering procedure in this example comprises amoving averaging of neighboring data points. We shall denote a movingoverage over a set of adjacent points by angular brackets with asubscript indicating the number of points included in the averagingoperator. Thus, the preliminary data filtering at this sub step isdescribed by the equation $\begin{matrix}{{{\langle u_{i}\rangle}_{2} = {{\frac{1}{2}{\sum\limits_{j = i}^{j = {i + 1}}u_{j}}} = \frac{u_{i} + u_{i + 1}}{2}}},} & (10.1)\end{matrix}$

[0161] for each i=1, 2, . . . N−1, where N is a number of data points inthe corresponding (RR or QT) raw data set. Thus, the RR and QT intervaldurations and the corresponding sampling time points are identicallyaveraged in order to preserve the one-to-one correspondence betweenthem. This procedure removes the high frequency noise present in the rawdata. This preliminary smoothing can also be described in the frequencydomain and alternatively achieved via appropriate low-pass filtering.All the following processing pertinent to this example will be done onthe averaged data points <u_(i)>₂ and the angular brackets will beomitted to simplify the notation.

[0162] 2. Preliminary Estimation of the t-Coordinates of the Minima (Box2 in FIG. 11).

[0163] The sub step consists of preliminary estimation of the timeinstants, t_(RR) ^(i) ^(_(m)) and t_(QT) ^(j) ^(_(m)) of the minima ofthe initially averaged RR-interval and QT-interval-data sets,respectively. The algorithm does a sequential sorting of the data setschoosing M data points corresponding to M least values of the RR- orQT-intervals and then averages the result. (In our examples, M=10.)First, the algorithm finds the u-vector u_(i) ₁ =(t^(i) ^(₁) ,T^(i) ^(₁)) corresponding to the shortest interval T^(i) ^(₁) . Next, this datapoint is removed from the data set {u_(i)} and the algorithm sorts theremaining data set and again finds a u-vector u_(i) ₂ =(t^(i) ^(₂) ,T^(i) ^(₂) ) corresponding to the shortest interval T^(i) ^(₂) . Theminimum point is again removed from the data sets and sorting isrepeated over and over again, until the M^(th) u-vector u_(i) _(m)=(t^(i) ^(_(m)) ,T^(i) ^(_(m)) ) corresponding to the shortest intervalT^(i) ^(_(m)) is found. Next, the algorithm averages all M pairs andcalculates the average minimum time coordinate {overscore (t)} definedas $\begin{matrix}{\overset{\_}{t} = {\frac{1}{M}{\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{M}t^{i_{k}}}}} & (10.2)\end{matrix}$

[0164] Finally, the algorithm determines the sampling time instant t^(i)^(_(m)) , which is nearest to {overscore (t)}. We thus arrive to t_(RR)^(i) ^(_(m)) and t_(QT) ^(j) ^(_(m)) for RR and QT data sets,respectively.

[0165] 3. The First Correction of the Coordinates of the PreliminaryMinima (Box 3 in FIG. 11).

[0166] At this sub step the first correction to the minimum coordinatest_(RR) ^(i) ^(_(m)) and t_(QT) ^(j) ^(_(m)) is found. This part of thealgorithm is based on the iterative exponential fitting of theT-component of the initially filtered data set {u_(i)}={t^(i),T^(i)} byfunctions of the form

T(t)=Aexp[β|t−t ^(m)|],  (10.3)

[0167] where t^(m) is the time instant of the corresponding minimumdetermined at the previous sub step (i.e., t^(m)=t_(RR) ^(i) ^(_(m)) forRR-intervals and t^(m)=t_(QT) ^(j) ^(_(m)) for QT-intervals). Thefitting is done separately for the descending (t<t^(m)) and ascending(t>t^(m)) branches of u(t) with the same value of constants A and t^(m)and different values of β for both branches. The initial value of A istaken from the preliminary estimation at sub step 2: A=T^(i) ^(_(m)) andt^(m)=t^(i) ^(_(m)) (i.e., A=T_(RR) ^(i) ^(_(m)) , t^(m)=t^(i) ^(_(m))for RR-intervals and A=T_(QT) ^(j) ^(_(m)) ,t^(m)=t_(QT) ^(j) ^(_(m))for QT-intervals). The initial value of constant β for each branch andeach data sub set is obtained from the requirement that the initial meanroot square deviation σ=σ₀ of the entire corresponding branch from itsfit by equation (10.3) is minimum. In each subsequent iteration cyclenew values of constants A and β are determined for each branch. At thebeginning of each iteration cycle a constant A is taken from theprevious step and the value of β is numerically adjusted to minimize thedeviation value, σ. Such iterations are repeated while the mean squaredeviation a is becoming smaller and are stopped when σ reaches a minimumvalue, σ=σ_(min). At the end of this sub step the algorithm outputs thecorrected values A and β and the respective values of σ_(min) ^(RR) andσ_(min) ^(QT).

[0168] 4. The Preliminary Smooth Curves (Box 4 in FIG. 11).

[0169] The sub step consists of calculating a series of moving averagesover p consecutive points for each data subset {u} as follows$\begin{matrix}{{u_{i}^{p} \equiv {\langle u_{i}\rangle}_{p}} = {\frac{1}{p}{\sum\limits_{j = 1}^{i + p - 1}{u_{j}.}}}} & (10.4)\end{matrix}$

[0170] We shall refer to the quantity p as the width of the averagingwindow. The calculation is performed for different values of p, and thenthe optimum value of the width of the averaging window p=m is determinedby minimizing the mean square deviation of the set {u_(i) ^(p)}={t_(i)^(p),T_(i) ^(p)} from its fit by Eq. (10.3) with the values ofparameters A, t^(m), and β determined at sub step 3. Having performedthis procedure for each component of the data set (RR and QT) we arriveto the preliminary smoothed data set {u_(i) ^(m)}={t_(i) ^(m),T_(i)^(m)}, where $\begin{matrix}{{T_{i}^{m} = {\frac{1}{m}{\sum\limits_{j = i}^{i + m - 1}T^{i}}}},{t_{i}^{m} = {\frac{1}{m}{\sum\limits_{j = i}^{i + m - 1}t^{i}}}}} & (10.5)\end{matrix}$

[0171] The number of points in such a data set is N_(m)=N−m+1, where Nis the number of data points after the initial filtering at sub step 1.

[0172] 5. Correction of the Preliminary Smooth Curves and the SecondCorrection of the QT and RR Minimal Values and its Coordinates (Box 5 inFIG. 11).

[0173] At this sub step we redefine the moving averages (using a smalleraveraging window) in the vicinity of the minimum of quantity T (RR or QTinterval). This is useful to avoid distortions of the sought (fitting)curve T=T(t) near its minimum. The algorithm first specifies all datapoints {t^(i),T^(i)} such that T^(i) lie between${\min\limits_{i}{\{ T^{i} \} \quad {and}\quad {\min\limits_{i}\{ T^{i} \}}}} + {\sigma_{\min}.}$

[0174] These data points have the superscript values i from thefollowing set $\begin{matrix}{I = {\{ {i:{T^{i} \in \lbrack {{\min\limits_{i}\{ T^{i} \}},{{\min\limits_{i}\{ T^{i} \}} + \sigma_{\min}}} \rbrack}} \}.}} & (10.6)\end{matrix}$

[0175] Let us denote by i₀εI and i_(q)εI the subscript valuescorresponding to the earliest and latest time instants among {t_(i)}(iεI). We thus set i₀=min{I} and i_(q)=max{I}. Denoting the number ofpoints in such a set by q_(RR) for the RR data and by q_(QT), for the QTdata we determine the width, q, of the averaging window as the minimumof the two, q=min{q_(QT),q_(RR)}. Now we write the moving average forthe data points in the vicinity of the minimum as $\begin{matrix}{{u_{i}^{q} \equiv {\langle u_{i}\rangle}_{q}} = {\frac{1}{q}{\sum\limits_{j = i}^{i + q - 1}u_{j}}}} & (10.7)\end{matrix}$

[0176] Such modified averaging is applied to all consecutive data pointsu_(i) with the subscript i ranging from i₀ to i_(q). The final(smoothed) data set consists of the first i₀−1 data points defined byEq. (10.4) with i=1, 2, . . . i₀−1, q points defined by Eq. (10.7) withi=i₀, i₀+1, . . . , i_(q), and N−i_(q)−m points defined again by Eq.(10.4) with i=i_(q)+1, i_(q)+2, . . . , N−m+1. This the final set{{overscore (u_(i))}} can be presented as

{{overscore (u_(i))}}={u _(i) ^(p) : iε{1, 2, . . . , i₀ −1}∪{i _(q)+1,. . . , N−m+1}}∪{u _(i) ^(q) : iε{i ₀ , i ₀+1, . . . , i _(q)}}  (10.8)

[0177] At the end of sub step 10.5 the algorithm determines the finalminimum values of QT and RR interval and the corresponding timeinstants. The algorithm sorts the smoothed data sets (10.8) anddetermines {overscore (u)}_(min)≡({overscore (t)}_(min),{overscore(T)}_(min)) corresponding to the minimum value of {overscore (T)}_(i).This can be written as $\begin{matrix}{{{\overset{\_}{u}}_{\min} \equiv \{ {{( {{\overset{\_}{t}}_{i_{m}},{\overset{\_}{T}}_{i_{m}}} ):{\overset{\_}{T}}_{i_{m}}} = {\min\limits_{k}\{ {\overset{\_}{T}}_{k} \}}} \}} = {{\overset{\_}{u}}_{i_{m}}.}} & (10.9)\end{matrix}$

[0178] 6. Final Fitting and the Final Smooth QT and RR Curves (Box 6 inFIG. 11).

[0179] At this sub step the parameters of functions representing finalsmooth QT and RR curves are found. First, each data set {{overscore(u)}_(i)} is split into two subsets {u⁻ ^(i)} and {u₊ ^(i)}corresponding to the descending ({overscore (t)}_(i)≦{overscore (t)}_(i)_(m) ) and ascending ({overscore (t)}_(i)≧{overscore (t)}_(i) _(m) )branch, respectively. We also shift the time origin to the minimum point({overscore (t)}_(i) _(m) ) and change the axis direction of thedescending branch. These redefined variables are thus given by:

{u ⁻ ^(i)}={(t ⁻ ^(i) ,T ⁻ ^(i))≡({overscore (t)} _(i) _(m) −{overscore(t)} _(i) ,{overscore (T)} _(i)): i≦i_(m)}},  (10.10a)

{u ₊ ^(i)}={(t ₊ ^(i) ,T ₊ ^(i))≡({overscore (t)} _(i) −{overscore (t)}_(i) _(m) ,{overscore (T)} _(i)): i≧i_(m)}.  (10.10b)

[0180] Notice that the minimum point is included in both branches. Nextwe perform a linear regression by fitting each branch with a 4-th orderpolynomial function in the following form

T _(±)(t _(±))=a _(±) t _(±) ⁴ +b _(±) t _(±) ³ +c _(±) y _(±) ²d  (10.11)

[0181] The linear term is not included into this expression since thisfunction must have a minimum at t_(±)=0. The value of d is defined by

d={overscore (T)}_(min)  (10.12)

[0182] For computational convenience the variables us are transformedinto z±=T_(±)−d and then the coefficients a_(±), b_(±), and c_(±) aredetermined from the condition that expression for the error$\begin{matrix}{ɛ = {\sum\limits_{i}\lbrack {z_{\pm}^{i} - {a_{\pm}( t_{\pm}^{i} )}^{4} - {b_{\pm}( t_{\pm}^{i} )}^{3} - {c_{\pm}( y_{\pm}^{i} )}^{2}} \rbrack^{2}}} & (10.13)\end{matrix}$

[0183] where summation is performed over all points of the correspondingbranch, is minimized. We thus obtain four similar sets of linearalgebraic equations—two for each of the u_(±) branches of the two RR andQT data sets. These equations have the form $\begin{matrix}{{{\begin{matrix}{\sum( t_{\pm}^{i} )^{8}} & {\sum( t_{\pm}^{i} )^{7}} & {\sum( t_{\pm}^{i} )^{6}} \\{\sum( t_{\pm}^{i} )^{7}} & {\sum( t_{\pm}^{i} )^{6}} & {\sum( t_{\pm}^{i} )^{5}} \\{\sum( t_{\pm}^{i} )^{6}} & {\sum( t_{\pm}^{i} )^{5}} & {\sum( t_{\pm}^{i} )^{4}}\end{matrix}}\quad {\begin{matrix}a_{\pm} \\b_{\pm} \\c_{\pm}\end{matrix}}} = {\begin{matrix}{\sum{( t_{\pm}^{i} )^{4}z_{\pm}^{i}}} \\{\sum{( t_{\pm}^{i} )^{3}z_{\pm}^{i}}} \\{\sum{( t_{\pm}^{i} )^{2}z_{\pm}^{i}}}\end{matrix}}} & (10.14)\end{matrix}$

[0184] All summations are performed over all points of the branch. Nowthe QT and RR interval time dependences curves can be presented as thefollows $\begin{matrix}{{T_{R\quad R}(t)} = \{ {\begin{matrix}{{T_{R\quad R}^{-}( {t - t_{\min}^{R\quad R}} )},} & {t \leq t_{\min}^{R\quad R}} \\{{T_{R\quad R}^{+}( {t - t_{\min}^{R\quad R}} )},} & {t \geq t_{\min}^{R\quad R}}\end{matrix}{and}} } & (10.15) \\{{T_{Q\quad T}(t)} = \{ \begin{matrix}{{T_{Q\quad T}^{-}( {t - t_{\min}^{Q\quad T}} )},} & {t \leq t_{\min}^{Q\quad T}} \\{{T_{Q\quad T}^{+}( {t - t_{\min}^{Q\quad T}} )},} & {t \geq t_{\min}^{Q\quad T}}\end{matrix} } & (10.16)\end{matrix}$

[0185] and

[0186] where T_(RR) ^(±)(t) and T_(QT) ^(±)(t) are the fourth orderpolynomials given by Eq. (10.11) and t_(min) ^(RR) and t_(min) ^(QT) arethe time coordinates of the corresponding minima defined by Eq. (10.9).Thus, formulas (10.10)-(10.16) determine the final smooth QT and RRcurves with minima defined by formula (10.9).

[0187] 7. Final Smooth Hysteresis Loop (Box 7 in FIG. 11).

[0188] At this sub-step the software first generates a dense (N+1)-pointtime-grid τ_(k)=t_(start)+k(t_(end)−t_(start))/N, where k=0, 1, 2, . . ., N (N=1000 in this example) and t_(start) and t_(end) are the actualvalues of time at the beginning and end of the measurements,respectively. Then it computes the values of the four functions T_(RR)^(±)(τ−t_(min) ^(RR)) and T_(QT) ^(±)(τ−t_(min) ^(QT)) on the grid,which parametrically represents the final smooth curves (T_(RR)^(±)(τ−t_(min) ^(RR)), T_(QT) ^(RR)(τ−t_(min) ^(QT))) in computer memoryfor the ascending (+) and descending (−) branches, respectively. Thisprocedure is a computational equivalent of the analytical elimination oftime. Next, the software also plots these smooth curves on the(T_(RR),T_(QT))-plane or on another, similar plane, such as(f_(RR),T_(QT)), where f=1/T_(RR) is the instantaneous heart rate.Finally, the algorithm adds to the curves a set of points representing aclosing line, which connects the end point of the lower (descending)branch with the initial point on the of the upper (ascending) branchand, thus, generates a closed QT/RR hysteresis loop.

[0189] 8. A Measure of the Domain Bounded by the QT/RR Hysteresis Loop(Box 8 in FIG. 11).

[0190] At this sub step a measure of the domain inside the QT/RRhysteresis loop is computed by numerically evaluating the followingintegral (see definition above): $\begin{matrix}{S = {\int_{\Omega}{\int{{\rho ( {T_{RR},T_{QT}} )}{T_{RR}}{T_{QT}}}}}} & (10.17)\end{matrix}$

[0191] where Ω. is the domain on the (T_(RR),T_(QT))-plane with theboundary formed by the closed hysteresis loop, and ρ(T_(RR),T_(QT)) is anonnegative (weight) function. In this example we can takeρ(T_(RR),T_(QT))=1 so that S coincides with the area of domain Ω, or weset ρ=1/(T_(RR))² so S coincides with the dimensionless area of thedomain inside the hysteresis loop on the (f,T_(QT))-plane, wheref=1/T_(RR) is the heart rate.

EXAMPLE 11 A Method of a Sequential Moving Average

[0192] 1. Raw Data Averaging/Filtering.

[0193] The sub step (similar to 10.1) consists of raw data averaging(filtering) according to formula (10.4). This is performed for apreliminary set of values of the averaging window width, p.

[0194] 2. Final Moving Average Smoothing.

[0195] The sub step includes subsequent final smoothing of thepreliminary smoothed data represented by the set {u_(i) ^(p)} found atthe previous step: as follows. $\begin{matrix}{{\overset{\_}{u^{p}} \equiv {\langle u_{i}^{p}\rangle}_{m_{f}}} = {\frac{1}{m_{f}}{\sum\limits_{j = i}^{j = {i + m_{f} - 1}}{u_{j}^{p}.}}}} & (11.1)\end{matrix}$

[0196] The window width m_(f) is varied numerically to achieve optimumsmoothness and accuracy of the fit. The optimally averaged data pointsform smooth curves on the corresponding planes (FIGS. 12,14).

[0197] 3. A Measure of the Domain Inside the QT/RR Hysteresis Loop.

[0198] The procedure on this sub step is as defined in Example 10, step8, above.

EXAMPLE 12 A Method of Optimized Nonlinear Transformations

[0199]FIG. 15 illustrates major steps in the data processing procedureinvolving our nonlinear transformations method. The first three stagesfor the RR and QT data sets are quite similar and each results in thecomputation of the fitted bird-like curves, T^(RR)=T^(RR)(t) andT^(QT)=T^(QT)(t), on a dense time-grid. Having computed both bird-likecurves one actually completes the data processing procedure, becauseafter appropriate synchronization, these two dependences parametricallyalong with a closing line represent the sought hysteresis loop on the(T^(RR), T^(QT)), or similar, plane. We will describe our method ingeneral terms equally applicable for the QT and RR interval data sets,and indicate the specific instants where there is a difference in thealgorithm.

[0200] 1. Preliminary Data Processing Stage.

[0201] Let {T_(k)}, k=1, 2, . . . , N, be a set of the measured RR or QTinterval durations, and {t_(k)} be a set of the corresponding timeinstants, so that t₁ and t_(N) are the starting and ending time instants(segments) of the entire record. The first three similar stages (stages1 through 3 in FIG. 15) are the preliminary stage, the secondary,nonlinear-transformation stage, and the computational stage. A moredetailed data flow chart for these stages is shown in FIG. 16. Thepreliminary stage, indicated by boxes 1 through 7 in FIG. 16, is acombination of traditional data processing methods and includes:smoothing (averaging) the data sets (1), determination of a region nearthe minimum (2), and fitting a quadratic parabola to the data in thisregion (3), checking consistency of the result (4), renormalizing andcentering the data at the minimum (5), cutting off the data segmentsoutside the exercise region and separating the ascending and descendingbranches (6), and finally filtering off a data segment in near theminimum (7). Let us discuss these steps in more detail.

[0202] Box 1 in FIG. 16, indicates the moving averaging and itselfconsists of two steps. First, we specify the initial value of the movingaverage procedure parameter m, as $\begin{matrix}{m = {\max \{ {{r( \frac{N}{N_{c}} )},m_{\min}} \}}} & (12.1)\end{matrix}$

[0203] where r(x) is the integer closest to x, and the values of N_(c)and m_(min) are chosen depending on the number N of data points and theamount of random fluctuations in the data (the size of the randomcomponent in the data). In our examples we have chosen N_(c)=100 andm_(min)=3. The value of m can be redefined iteratively at the laterstages and its choice will be discussed therein. Next we compute themoving average for {t_(i)} and {T_(i)} data sets with the givenaveraging parameter m as follows: $\begin{matrix}{{{\langle t_{k}\rangle}_{m} = {\frac{1}{m}{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m}t_{k + i}}}},{{\langle T_{k}\rangle}_{m} = {\frac{1}{m}{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{m}T_{k + i}}}}} & (12.2)\end{matrix}$

[0204] The subscript m will be omitted below if m is fixed and noambiguity can arise. The next step in our algorithm is the initialdetermination of a time interval on which the parabolic fit will beperformed, (the parabolic fit interval). This step is represented inFIG. 16 by Box 2. We note that this data subset can be redefined at alater stage if a certain condition is not satisfied. In the currentrealization of our algorithm this region defined differently for{t_(i),T_(i) ^(RR)} and {t_(i),T_(i) ^(QT)} data sets. For the data set{t_(i),T_(i) ^(RR)} the initial parabolic fit segment is defined as thedata segment {t_(i),T_(i) ^(RR)} with all sequential values of i betweeni₁ and i₂ where i₁=n_(min)−Δm and i₂=n_(min)+Δm, and the integerparameters n_(min) and Δm are defined as follows. The number n_(min)determines the time instant t_(n) _(min) among the original set of timeinstants which is the closest to the minimum on the averaged data set{<t_(i)>,<T_(i)>}. In other words, t_(n) _(min) is the nearest to theaverage time instant <t_(M)> which corresponds to the minimum value ofthe average RR-interval <T_(i) ^(RR)>, that is, the time instant withthe subscript value M defined by the condition $\begin{matrix}{{\langle T_{M}^{RR}\rangle} = {\min\limits_{i}\{ {\langle T_{i}^{RR}\rangle} \}}} & (12.3)\end{matrix}$

[0205] The value of Δm is linked to the value of m by the conditionΔm=2m. The link between Δn and m arises from the requirement that thealgorithm is stable and consistent. The consistency is the requirementthat the positions of the minimum of the curve obtained by movingaveraging and by quadratic fitting were approximately the same. On theother hand, it is also important that the value of m is sufficientlysmall because quadratic fitting is done with the purpose to describe thedata only locally in the immediate vicinity of the minimum.

[0206] For the data set {t_(i),T_(i) ^(QT)} the initial parabolic fitsegment is defined as the data subset that consists of all consecutivepoints belonging to the lower portion of the non-averaged {T_(i) ^(QT)}data set. We thus define i₁ as the first (minimum) number i such that$\begin{matrix}{T_{i}^{Q\quad T} \leq {{\min\limits_{j}( T_{j}^{Q\quad T} )} + {R\lbrack {{\max\limits_{j}( T_{j}^{Q\quad T} )} - {\min\limits_{j}( T_{j}^{Q\quad T} )}} \rbrack}}} & (12.4)\end{matrix}$

[0207] where R is a parameter, 0<R<1, that determines the portion of thedata to be fitted with the quadratic parabola. In our calculations weset R=⅛=0.125, so we fit with the parabola the data points thatcorrespond to the bottom 12.5% of the interval durations. Thus, thesubscript i, is the first (smallest) value of i such that condition(12.4) is satisfied. Similarly, i₂ is the last (greatest) value of isuch that condition (12.4) is satisfied. The initial fit region is thendefined as the following non-averaged data subset: {(t_(i),T_(i) ^(QT)):i=i₁, i₁+1, i₁+2, . . . , i₂}. This method can also be used fordetermining an initial data segment for the quadratic polynomial fittingof the RR-data set.

[0208] At the next step, shown by box 3 in FIG. 12.2, we fit the data inthis region (for each data set) by a parabola so that the data areapproximately represented by the equation

T _(k) ≈P ₁ t _(k) ² +P ₂ t _(k) +P ₃, k=j₁, j₁+1, j₁+2, . . . ,j₂.  (12.5)

[0209] This is done using usual linear regression on this data subset.At the next step (Box 4 in FIG. 16) we check if the parabola has aminimum (i.e., if P₁>0). If this condition is satisfied, thedetermination of the parabolic fit interval and the fitting parabolaitself is completed. Otherwise, we enter the loop indicated by boxes 1athrough 3a in FIG. 16. The first step there is similar to the abovesecond step utilized for the RR interval data set and defines anextended segment for the parabolic fitting. This is done by replacing mwith m+1 and using this new value of m to redefine Δm=2m and alsocalculate new averaged data sets in accordance with Eq. (12.2) asindicated by Box 1a in FIG. 16. This allows us to evaluate a new valueof n_(min) and new values of i₁=n_(min)−Δm and i₂=n_(min)+Δm with newvalue of m (Box 2a). Then the parabolic fit is done again (Box 3a) andthe condition P₁>0, that the parabola has a minimum, is checked again.If it is satisfied, the determination of the fit interval and thequadratic fit coefficients procedure is completed. Otherwise we replacem with m+1 and repeat the process again and again until the conditionP₁>0 is satisfied. This condition ensures that the extremum of thequadratic parabola is a minimum indeed. By the very design of theexercise protocol the average heart rate reaches a certain maximumsomewhere inside the load stage and therefore corresponding averageRR-interval reaches a minimum. This ensures that a so-defined datasegment exists and is unique, and therefore the coefficients of thequadratic parabola are well defined. In short, we use the shortest datasegment that is centered around the minimum of the averaged data set andthat generates a quadratic parabola with a minimum (P₁>0).

[0210] The parabolic fit defines two important parameters of the dataprocessing procedure, the position (t_(min),T_(min)) of the minimum onthe (t, T)-plane as follows $\begin{matrix}{{t_{\min} = {- \frac{P_{2}}{2P_{1}}}},{T_{\min} = {P_{3} - {\frac{P_{2}^{2}}{4P_{1}}.}}}} & (12.6)\end{matrix}$

[0211] These parameters are final in the sense that our final fit curvewill always pass through and have a minimum at the point(t_(min),T_(min)). The coordinates (t_(min),T_(min)) thus constituteparameters of our final fit bird-like curve. Having found the ordinateT_(min) of the minimum we can renormalization of the T-data set asfollows: $\begin{matrix}{y_{k} = {\frac{T_{k}}{T_{\min}}.}} & (12.7)\end{matrix}$

[0212] We also take the abscissa of the parabola's minimum t_(min) asthe time origin and define the time components of the data points asfollows

t _(i) ⁻ =t _(i) −t _(min), t_(i)≦0,

t _(j) ⁺ =t _(j) −t _(min) t_(j)>0.  (12.8)

[0213] These two data transformations are indicated by Box 5 in FIG. 16.We also restrict the data set only to the exercise period, plus someshort preceding and following intervals (Box 5). The conditions t_(i)⁻≦0, and t_(j) ⁺>o define the descending, {t_(i) ⁻,T_(i)}, andascending, {t_(j) ⁺, Tj}, branches, respectively, so the correspondingdata points can be readily identified and separated (Box 6). Given thedurations t_(d) and t_(a) of the descending and ascending load stage,respectively, we can reduce the original set by cutting off the pointson the descending branch with t_(i) ⁻<−t_(d) and the points on theascending branch with t_(j) ⁺>t_(a) (Box 6 in FIG. 16). This determinesthe minimum value i₀ of subscript i for the descending branch, and themaximum value j_(max) of subscript j on the ascending branch.

[0214] The final step of the preliminary data processing is theconditional sorting (Box 7). The conditional sorting removes allconsecutive points such that at least one of them falls below theminimum of the parabola. The removal of the points below the minimum isnecessary because the nonlinear transformation is possible only wheny_(i)≧1. Eliminating only separate points below the minimum y=1 wouldcreate a bias in the data. Therefore, we have to eliminate an entiresegment of the data in the vicinity of the minimum. It should beremembered though, that these points have already been taken intoaccount in the above quadratic filtering procedure that determines(t_(min),T_(min)) via Eq. (12.6).

[0215] Thus, the preliminary data processing results in two data setscorresponding to the descending and ascending load stages. Thedescending data set is defined as a set of consecutive pairs (t_(i) ⁻,y_(i))≡(t_(i) ⁻, y_(i) ⁻) with i=i₀, i₀+1, i₀+2, . . . , i_(max), wherei_(max) is determined by the conditional sorting as the largestsubscript i value still satisfying the condition y_(i)≧1. Similarly, theascending data set is defined as a set of consecutive pairs (t_(i)⁺,y_(i))≡(t_(I) ⁺,y_(i) ⁺) with j=j_(min), j₀+1, j₀+2, . . . , j_(max),where j_(min) is determined by the conditional sorting as the firstsubscript j value on the ascending branch starting from which thecondition y_(j)≧1 is satisfied for all subsequent j.

[0216] 2. Secondary Data Processing.

[0217] At the second stage we introduce a fundamentally new method ofnonlinear regression by means of two consecutive optimal nonlineartransformations. The idea of the method is to introduce for each branchtwo appropriate nonlinear transformations of the dependent andindependent variables, y=f(u) and u=φ(t), both transformations dependingon some parameters, and choose the values of the parameters in such away that the composition of these transformations f(φ(t_(i))) wouldprovide an approximation for y_(i). Let (t_(i) ⁻, y_(I) ⁻) and (t_(i) ⁺,y_(i) ⁺) be the cut, conditionally sorted and normalized data setcorresponding to the descending and ascending branches representing thedynamics of the RR- or QT-intervals during exercise. The nonlineartransformation y

u is defined via a smooth function

y=f _(γ)(u),  (12.9)

[0218] that has a unit minimum at u=1, so that f_(γ)(1)=1, f_(γ)′(1)=0,and f_(γ)(u) grows monotonously when u≧1 and decreases monotonously whenu≦0. The subscript y represents a set of discrete or continuousparameters and indicates a particular choice of such a function. Let usdenote by f_(γ) ⁻(u) the monotonously decreasing branch of f_(γ)(u) andits monotonously increasing branch, by f_(γ) ⁺(u). We can thus write$\begin{matrix}{{f_{\gamma}(u)} = \{ \begin{matrix}{{f_{\gamma}^{-}(u)},{{{when}\quad u} \leq 1},} \\{{f_{\gamma}^{+}(u)},{{{when}\quad u} \leq 1.}}\end{matrix} } & (12.10)\end{matrix}$

[0219] Let u=g_(γ) ⁺(y) and u=g_(γ) ⁻(y) be the inverse functions forthe respective branches of f_(γ)(u). The functions g_(γ) ⁺(y) and f_(γ)⁺(u) are monotonously increasing, while the functions g_(γ) ⁻(y) andf_(γ) ⁻(u) are monotonously decreasing. Let {t_(i), y_(i) ⁻} representthe data for the descending segment of the data set, i.e. t_(i)<t_(min)and {t_(i), y_(i) ⁺} represent the data for the ascending segment of thedata set i.e. for t_(i)>t_(min). The transformation

u _(γ,i) ⁻ =g _(γ) ⁻(y _(i) ⁻)  (12.11)

[0220] maps the monotonously decreasing (on the average) data set{t_(i), y_(i) ⁻} into a monotonously increasing one:

{t _(i) ,y _(i) ⁻

}

{t _(i) g _(γ) ⁻(y _(i) ⁻)}≡{t _(i) ,u _(γ,i) ⁻}  (12.12)

[0221] Moreover, the average slope of the original data set isdecreasing as t_(i) approaches t_(min) and eventually vanishing at theminimum. In contrast, the average slope of the transformed data set isalways nonzero at t=t_(min). Similarly, the transformation

u _(γ,j) ⁺ =g _(γ) ⁺(y _(j) ⁺)  (12.13)

[0222] maps the monotonously increasing (on the average) data set{t_(i), y_(i) ⁺} into a monotonously increasing one:

{t _(j) ,y _(j) ⁺

}

{t _(j) ,g _(γ) ⁺(y _(j) ⁺)}≡{t _(j) , u _(γ,j) ⁺}  (12.14)

[0223] In our examples we used a discrete parameter γ taking two valuesγ=1 and γ=2 that correspond to two particular choices of the nonlineary-transformation. The first case (γ=1) is described by the equations

y=f ₁(u)≡1+(u−1)²; u⁻ =g ₁ ⁻(y)≡y−{square root}{square root over(y²−1)}, u ⁺ =g ₁ ⁺(y)≡y+{square root}{square root over(y²−1)}.  (12.15)

[0224] The second case, γ=2, is described by the equations$\begin{matrix}{{{y = {{f_{2}(u)} \equiv {u + \frac{1}{u}}}};{u^{-} = {{g_{2}^{-}(y)} \equiv {1 - \sqrt{y - 1}}}}},{u^{+} = {{g_{2}^{+}(y)} \equiv {1 + {\sqrt{y - 1}.}}}}} & (12.16)\end{matrix}$

[0225] Both functions reach a minimum y=1 at u=1. An example of such afunction depending on a continuous parameter γ>0 is given by$\begin{matrix}{{{f_{\gamma}(u)} = {A_{Y}\{ {\frac{1}{\gamma^{2} + {b_{\gamma}u}} + \frac{\gamma^{2}b_{\gamma}u}{{\gamma^{2}b_{\gamma}u} + 1}} \}}},{b_{\gamma} \equiv {1 + \gamma + {\frac{1}{\gamma}.}}}} & (12.17)\end{matrix}$

[0226] The parameter b_(γ) has been determined from the condition thatfγ(u) has a minimum at u=1 and the coefficient A_(γ) is determined bythe condition f_(γ)(1)=1, which yields $\begin{matrix}{A_{\gamma} = \frac{\gamma^{3} + \gamma^{2} + \gamma + 1}{\gamma^{3} + \gamma^{2} + {2\gamma}}} & (12.18)\end{matrix}$

[0227] In our numerical examples below we utilize the discrete parametercase with γ taking two values, 1 and 2. The original and transformedsets are shown in FIGS. 17 (RR intervals) and 18 (QT-intervals). PanelsA in both figures show the original data sets on the (t,T)-plane andpanels B and C show the transformed sets on the (t,u)-plane, for γ=1 andfor γ=2, respectively. The parabola minima on panels A and C are markedwith a circled asterisk. The original data points concentrate near anon-monotonous curve (the average curve). The data points on thetransformed plane concentrate around a monotonously growing (average)curve. Moreover, the figure illustrates that the transformation changesthe slope of the average curve in the vicinity of t=t_(min) from zero toa finite, nonzero value. On the (t−t_(min),u)-plane the pointcorresponding to the parabola's minimum is (0,1). This point is alsomarked by a circled asterisk on panels B and C of FIGS. 17 and 18.

[0228] Let us introduce a pair of new time variables τ⁻ and τ⁺ for thedescending and ascending branches, respectively. We shall count them offfrom the abscissa of the minimum of the fitted parabola and set

τ_(i) ⁻ =t _(min) −t _(i), t_(i)≦t_(min), i=1, 2, . . . , I⁻

τ_(j) ⁺ =t _(j) −t _(min), t_(j)≧t_(min), j=1, 2, . . . , J⁺  (12.19)

[0229] where I⁻ and J⁺ are the number of data points on the descendingand ascending branches, respectively. The (formerly) descending branchcan be treated in exactly the same way as the ascending one ifsimultaneously with the time inversion given by the first line in Eq.(12.19) we perform an additional transformation of the descending branchordinates as follows

v _(k)=1−u _(k) ⁻.  (12.20)

[0230] In these variables both branches (τ_(i) ⁻, v_(i)) and (τ_(j)⁺,u_(j) ⁺) are monotonously growing and start from the same point(τ=0,u=1) at which both have nonzero slope and possess similar behavior(convexity).

[0231] Since both branches are treated in exactly the same way, we shallsimplify the notation and temporarily omit the superscripts ± and write(τ_(k),u_(k)) for any of the pairs (τ_(i) ⁻,v_(i)) or (τ_(j) ⁺,u_(j) ⁺).We shall fit the data set {u_(k)} with {φ(α, β, τ_(k))}, that isrepresent {u_(k)} as

u _(k)≈φ(α,β,K,τ _(k))  (12.21)

[0232] where the function φ depends linearly on K and is defined as

φ(α,β, K, τ)≡1+Kξ(α,β,t)  (12.22)

[0233] where${\xi ( {\alpha,\beta,\tau} )} = \{ \begin{matrix}{\frac{\alpha}{\beta}( {1 + \frac{\tau}{\alpha}} )^{\beta}} & {{{when}\quad \beta} > 0} \\{s \equiv {\alpha \quad {\ln ( {1 + \frac{\tau}{\alpha}} )}}} & {{{when}\quad \beta} = 0} \\{\frac{\alpha}{1 + \beta}\lbrack {( {1 + \frac{s}{\alpha}} )^{1 + \beta} - 1} \rbrack} & {{{when}\quad - 1} \leq \beta < 0}\end{matrix} $

[0234] A family of functions ξ(α,β,τ) is shown in FIG. 19 for fifteenvalues of parameter β. The parameter α is completely scaled out byplotting the function on the plane (τ/α,ε/α). The function ξ(α,β,τ) iscontinuous in all three variables and as a function of τ at fixed α andβ has a unit slope at τ=0, ξ′(α,β,0)=1. Therefore, at τ→0 the function ξpossesses a very simple behavior, ξ˜τ, which is independent of α and β(the size of the region of such behavior of course depends on α and β).The function ξ possesses the following important feature: when β passesthrough the point β=0, its asymptotic behavior at τ→∞ continuouslychanges from the power function, ξ˜τ^(β) at β>0, through ξ˜ln(τ) at β=0,to a power of the logarithm, ξ˜ln^(1+β)(τ) when −1<β<0. When β→−1, thebehavior of ξ changes once more, and becomes ξ˜ln(ln(τ)). The convexityof any function of the family is the same when β<1.

[0235] We shall explicitly express parameter K via α and β using therequirement for a given pair of α and β Eq-s. (12.22) and (12.23) ensurethe best data fit in the u-space in a certain vicinity of the point(τ=0,u=1). Let K₁ be the number of points where the fit is required. Thecorresponding quadratic error is then a function of K, α and β that canbe written as $\begin{matrix}{{ɛ^{(u)}( {K,\alpha,\beta} )} = {\sum\limits_{k \leq K_{1}}\lbrack {u_{k} - {K\quad {\phi ( {\alpha,\beta,T_{k}} )}}} \rbrack^{2}}} & (12.24)\end{matrix}$

[0236] and the requirement of its minimum immediately yields thefollowing expression for K $\begin{matrix}{K = {{K( {\alpha,\beta} )} \equiv \frac{\sum\limits_{k \leq K_{1}}{u_{k}{\phi ( {\alpha,\beta,\tau_{k}} )}}}{\sum\limits_{k \leq K_{1}}{\phi^{2}( {\alpha,\beta,\tau_{k}} )}}}} & (12.25)\end{matrix}$

[0237] In our calculations we used such K₁ value that would include alladjacent points with the values of u between u=1 and u=1+0.4(u_(max)−1). We have thus reduced the number of fitting parameters inour fitting procedure to two continuous parameters, α and β, and onediscrete parameter, γ. The fitting function thus becomes

y _(k) ≈f _(γ)(1+K(α,β)ξ(α,β,τ_(k)))  (12.26)

[0238] The values of parameters α, β, and K (and γ) are now directlydetermined by the condition that the fit error in the y-space$\begin{matrix}{{ɛ_{\gamma}^{(y)}( {\alpha,\beta} )} = {\sum\limits_{k}\lbrack {y_{k} - {f_{\gamma}( {1 + {{K( {\alpha,\beta} )}{\phi ( {\alpha,\beta,\tau_{\lambda}} )}}} )}} \rbrack^{2}}} & (12.27)\end{matrix}$

[0239] is minimum. The sum in Eq. (12.27) is evaluated numerically on agrid (α,β) values for γ equal 1 and 2. Then the values of α, β and γthat deliver a minimum to ε_(γ) ^((Y)) are found via numerical trials.Calculations can then be repeated on a finer grid in the vicinity of thefound minimum.

[0240] Having found parameters α_(min), β_(min) and γ_(min) for theascending branch we generate a dense t-grid {t_(s), s=1, 2, . . . , N}and calculate the corresponding values of the interval duration as

T _(S) =T _(min) f _(Y) _(min) (1+K(α_(min),β_(min))ξ(α_(min),β_(min) ,t_(s) −t _(min))).  (12.26)

[0241] A similar dense representation of the descending branch can becalculated in exactly the same way. The resulting bird-like curves areillustrated in panels A and C of FIG. 20. The actual absolute andrelative errors are indicated in the captions. The right hand sidepanels B and D represent hysteresis curves in two differentrepresentations and each resulting from the curves shown in Panels A andC. The following computations of the hysteresis loop and its measuregiven by Eq. (10.17) is then performed as described in Example 10.

EXAMPLE 13 Creation of an RR-Hysteresis Loop With the Procedures ofExamples 10-12

[0242] In addition to the procedures generating a hysteresis loop on theplane (QT-interval versus RR-interval) or an equivalent plane, one canintroduce and assess a separate hysteresis of the duration ofRR-interval versus exercise workload, which gradually varies,there-and-back, during the ascending and descending exercise stages. TheRR-hysteresis can be displayed as loops on different planes based onjust a single RR data set {t_(RR) ^(i), T_(RR) ^(i)} analysis. Forexample, such a loop can be displayed on the (τ^(i), T_(RR) ^(i))-plane,where τ^(i)=|t_(RR) ^(i)−t_(min)| and t_(min) is the time instantcorresponding to the peak of the exercise load, or the center of themaximum load period, which may be determined according to numericaltechniques described in the examples 10-12. The RR loop can also beintroduced on the (W(t_(RR) ^(i)), T_(RR) ^(i)) or (τ^(i), (T_(RR)^(i))⁻¹) planes. Here W(t_(RR) ^(i)) is a workload that varies versusexercise stages, i.e. time and (T_(RR) ^(i))⁻¹ represents the heartrate.

[0243] In order to apply a numerical technique from the Example 10 (orany other as in Examples 11 or 12), one repeats essentially the samecomputational steps described in these examples. However, instead ofconsidering both QT-{t_(QT) ^(i),T_(QT) ^(i)} and RR-{t_(RR) ^(i),T_(RR)^(i)} interval data sets, only a single RR data set is numericallyprocessed throughout the whole sequence of the described stages for acreation of a hysteresis loop. In this case variables τ^(i), (T_(RR)^(i))⁻¹ or W(t_(RR) ^(i)) play the role of the second alternatingcomponent that along with the first T_(RR) ^(i) variable forms theRR-hysteresis plane.

[0244] The foregoing examples are illustrative of the present inventionand are not to be construed as limiting thereof The invention is definedby the following claims, with equivalents of the claims to be includedtherein.

That which is claimed is:
 1. A method of assessing cardiac ischemia in asubject to provide a measure of cardiac or cardiovascular health in thatsubject, wherein said subject is afflicted with coronary artery disease,said method comprising the steps of: (a) collecting a first RR-intervaldata set from said subject during a stage of gradually increasing heartrate; (b) collecting a second RR-interval data set from said subjectduring a stage of gradually decreasing heart rate, with said first andsecond RR-interval data sets being collected while minimizing theinfluence of rapid transients due to autonomic nervous system andhormonal influence on said data sets; (c) comparing said firstRR-interval data set to said second RR-interval data set to determinethe difference between said data sets; and (d) generating from saidcomparison of step (c) a measure of cardiac ischemia during stimulationin said subject, wherein a greater difference between said first andsecond data sets indicates greater cardiac ischemia and lesser cardiacor cardiovascular health in said subject.
 2. The method according toclaim 1, wherein said first and second RR-interval data sets arecollected under quasi-stationary conditions.
 3. The method according toclaim 1, wherein said stage of gradually increasing heart rate and saidstage of gradually decreasing heart rate are each at least 3 minutes induration.
 4. The method according to claim 1, wherein said stage ofgradually increasing heart rate and said stage of gradually decreasingheart rate are together carried out for a total time of from 6 minutesto 40 minutes.
 5. The method according to claim 1, wherein: both saidstage of gradually increasing heart rate and said stage of graduallydecreasing heart rate are carried out between a peak rate and a minimumrate; and said peak rates of both said stage of gradually increasingheart rate and said stage of gradually decreasing heart rate are thesame.
 6. The method according to claim 5, wherein: said minimum rates ofboth said stage of gradually increasing heart rate and said stage ofgradually decreasing heart rate are substantially the same.
 7. Themethod according to claim 1, wherein said stage of gradually decreasingheart rate is carried out at at least three different heart-ratestimulation levels.
 8. The method according to claim 7, wherein saidstage of gradually increasing heart rate is carried out at at leastthree different heart-rate stimulation levels.
 9. The method accordingto claim 1, wherein said stage of gradually increasing heart rate andsaid stage of gradually decreasing heart rate are carried outsequentially in time.
 10. The method according to claim 1, wherein saidstage of gradually increasing heart rate and said stage of graduallydecreasing heart rate are carried out separately in time.
 11. The methodaccording to claim 1, wherein said generating step is carried out bygenerating curves from each of said data sets.
 12. The method accordingto claim 11, wherein said generating step is carried out by comparingthe shapes of said curves from data sets.
 13. The method according toclaim 11, wherein said generating step is carried out by determining ameasure of the domain between said curves.
 14. The method according toclaim 11, wherein said generating step is carried out by both comparingthe shapes of said curves from data sets and determining a measure ofthe domain between said curves.
 15. The method according to claim 11,further comprising the step of displaying said curves.
 16. The methodaccording to claim 1, wherein said heart rate during said stage ofgradually increasing heart rate does not exceed more than 120 beats perminute.
 17. The method according to claim 1, wherein said heart rateduring said stage of gradually increasing heart rate exceeds 120 beatsper minute.
 18. The method according to claim 1, further comprising thestep of: (e) comparing said measure of cardiac ischemia duringstimulation to at least one reference value; and then (f) generatingfrom said comparison of step (e) a quantitative indicium of cardiac orcardiovascular health for said subject.
 19. The method according toclaim 18, further comprising the steps of: (g) treating said subjectwith a cardiovascular therapy; and then (h) repeating steps (a) through(f) to assess the efficacy of said cardiovascular therapy, in which adecrease in the difference between said data sets from before saidtherapy to after said therapy indicates an improvement in cardiac healthin said subject from said cardiovascular therapy.
 20. The methodaccording to claim 19, wherein said cardiovascular therapy is selectedfrom the group consisting of aerobic exercise, muscle strength building,change in diet, nutritional supplement, weight loss, stress reduction,smoking cessation, pharmaceutical treatment, surgical treatment, andcombinations thereof.
 21. The method according to claim 18, furthercomprising the step of assessing from said quantitative indicum thelikelihood that said subject is at risk to experience a futureischemia-related cardiac incident.
 22. A method of assessing cardiacischemia in a subject to provide a measure of cardiac or cardiovascularhealth in that subject, wherein said subject is afflicted with coronaryartery disease, said method comprising the steps of: (a) collecting afirst RR-interval data set from said subject during a stage of graduallyincreasing exercise load and gradually increasing heart rate; and then,after an abrupt stop in exercise, (b) collecting a second RR-intervaldata set from said subject during a stage of rest and graduallydecreasing heart rate; (c) comparing said first RR-interval data set tosaid second RR-interval data set to determine the difference betweensaid data sets; and (d) generating from said comparison of step (c) ameasure of cardiac ischemia during exercise in said subject, wherein agreater difference between said first and second data sets indicatesgreater cardiac ischemia and lesser cardiac or cardiovascular health insaid subject.
 23. The method according to claim 22, wherein said stageof gradually increasing exercise load and stage of rest are each atleast 3 minutes in duration.
 24. The method according to claim 22,wherein said stage of gradually increasing exercise load and said stageof rest are together carried out for a total time of from 6 minutes to40 minutes.
 25. The method according to claim 22, wherein said stage ofgradually increasing exercise load is carried out at at least threedifferent load levels.
 26. The method according to claim 22, whereinsaid generating step is carried out by generating curves from each ofsaid data sets.
 27. The method according to claim 26, wherein saidgenerating step is carried out by comparing the shapes of said curvesfrom said data sets.
 28. The method according to claim 26, wherein saidgenerating step is carried out by determining a measure of the domainbetween said curves.
 29. The method according to claim 26, wherein saidgenerating step is carried out by both comparing the shapes of saidcurves from data sets and determining a measure of the domain betweensaid curves.
 30. The method according to claim 26, further comprisingthe step of displaying said curves.
 31. The method according to claim22, wherein said heart rate during said stage of gradually increasingexercise load does not exceed more than 120 beats per minute.
 32. Themethod according to claim 22, wherein said heart rate during said stageof gradually increasing heart rate exceeds 120 beats per minute.
 33. Themethod according to claim 22, further comprising the step of: (e)comparing said measure of cardiac ischemia during exercise to at leastone reference value; and then (f) generating from said comparison ofstep (e) a quantitative indicium of cardiac or cardiovascular health forsaid subject.
 34. The method according to claim 33, further comprisingthe steps of: (g) treating said subject with a cardiovascular therapy;and then (h) repeating steps (a) through (f) to assess the efficacy ofsaid cardiovascular therapy, in which a decrease in the differencebetween said data sets from before said therapy to after said therapyindicates an improvement in cardiac or cardiovascular health in saidsubject from said cardiovascular therapy.
 35. The method according toclaim 34, wherein said cardiovascular therapy is selected from the groupconsisting of aerobic exercise, muscle strength building, change indiet, nutritional supplement, weight loss, stress reduction, smokingcessation, pharmaceutical treatment, surgical treatment, andcombinations thereof.
 36. The method according to claim 34, furthercomprising the step of assessing from said quantitative indicium thelikelihood that said subject is at risk to experience a futureischemia-related cardiac incident.
 37. A method of assessing cardiacischemia in a subject to provide a measure of cardiac or cardiovascularhealth in that subject, wherein said subject is afflicted with coronaryartery disease, said method comprising the steps of: (a) collecting afirst RR-interval data set from said subject during a stage of graduallyincreasing exercise load and gradually increasing heart rate at least 5minutes in duration, and at at least three different load levels; andthen, after an abrupt stop in exercise, (b) collecting a secondRR-interval data set from said subject during a stage of rest andgradually decreasing heart rate at least 5 minutes in duration; (c)comparing said first RR-interval data set to said second RR-intervaldata set to determine the difference between said data sets; (d)generating from said comparison of step (c) a measure of cardiacischemia during exercise in said subject, wherein a greater differencebetween said first and second data sets indicates greater cardiacischemia and lesser cardiac or cardiovascular health in said subject;(e) comparing said measure of cardiac ischemia during exercise to atleast one reference value; and then (f) generating from said comparisonof step (e) a quantitative indicium of cardiac or cardiovascular healthfor said subject.
 38. The method according to claim 37, wherein saidstage of gradually increasing exercise load and said stage of rest aretogether carried out for a total time of from 6 minutes to 40 minutes.39. The method according to claim 37, wherein said generating step iscarried out by generating curves from each of said data sets.
 40. Themethod according to claim 39, wherein said generating step is carriedout by comparing the shapes of said curves from said data sets.
 41. Themethod according to claim 39, wherein said generating step is carriedout by determining a measure of the domain between said curves.
 42. Themethod according to claim 39, wherein said generating step is carriedout by both comparing the shapes of said curves from said data sets anddetermining a measure of the domain between said curves.
 43. The methodaccording to claim 39, further comprising the step of displaying saidcurves.
 44. The method according to claim 37, wherein said heart rateduring said stage of gradually increasing exercise load does not exceedmore than 120 beats per minute.
 45. The method according to claim 37,wherein said heart rate during said stage of gradually increasing heartrate exceeds 120 beats per minute.
 46. The method according to claim 37,further comprising the steps of: (g) treating said subject with acardiovascular therapy; and then (h) repeating steps (a) through (f) toassess the efficacy of said cardiovascular therapy, in which a decreasein the difference between said data sets from before said therapy toafter said therapy indicates an improvement in cardiac or cardiovascularhealth in said subject from said cardiovascular therapy.
 47. The methodaccording to claim 46, wherein said cardiovascular therapy is selectedfrom the group consisting of aerobic exercise, muscle strength building,change in diet, nutritional supplement, weight loss, stress reduction,smoking cessation, pharmaceutical treatment, surgical treatment, andcombinations thereof.
 48. The method according to claim 37, furthercomprising the step of assessing from said quantitative indicium thelikelihood that said subject is at risk to experience a futureischemia-related cardiac incident.